Well, the standard equation is in the form:
ax + bx = c (constant).
Thus, x and b must be isolated together on one side with the constant on the other. The equation which satisfies this is:
A. -2x + y = 5
Answer: 5^7 x 3^7
You could also write 15^7
Answer:
The required inequality is: 12 ≤ 3x < 21
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given: three times a number is greater than or equal to 12 and less than 21
We need to answer following questions:
1) The inequality translated in numerical form
Let number = x
12 ≤ 3x < 21
2) Your work solving the inequality
We need to find value of x. Divide the inequality by x
4 ≤ x < 7
3) The solution graphed on a number line
It is shown in figure attached.
4) The solution in set notation
The set notation is: Considering x belongs to natural numbers N
{∀ x|x∈N, 4 ≤ x < 7}
5) The solution in interval notation
The interval notation is: [4,7)
because we have 4 less than equal to x and x is less than 7
Answer: B
Step-by-step explanation:
the sum of any two sides is bigger than the third side... so 5+9= 14, bigger than 6. 5+6=11, greater than 9. 9+6=15, bigger than 5.
Answer:
For this case we want to check if the true mean for the depth of groves cut into aluminium by a machine is equal to 1.7 (null hypothesis) and the alternative hypothesis would be the complement different from 1.7. And the best system of hypothesis are:
Null hypothesis: data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bafc2/bafc21fb3ef64d6000671ae5ace0ed9f03d45ee7" alt="\mu =1.7"
Alternative hypothesis ![\mu \neq 1.7[/tx]And the best system of hypothesis are:3. This two-sided test: H0: μ = 1.7 mm H1: μ ≠ 1.7 mmStep-by-step explanation:For this case we want to check if the true mean for the depth of groves cut into aluminium by a machine is equal to 1.7 (null hypothesis) and the alternative hypothesis would be the complement different from 1.7. And the best system of hypothesis are:Null hypothesis: [tex]\mu =1.7](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmu%20%5Cneq%201.7%5B%2Ftx%5D%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EAnd%20the%20best%20system%20of%20hypothesis%20are%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E3.%20This%20two-sided%20test%3A%0A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EH0%3A%20%CE%BC%20%3D%201.7%20mm%0A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EH1%3A%20%CE%BC%20%E2%89%A0%201.7%20mm%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EStep-by-step%20explanation%3A%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3EFor%20this%20case%20we%20want%20to%20check%20if%20the%20true%20mean%20for%20the%20depth%20of%20groves%20cut%20into%20aluminium%20by%20a%20machine%20is%20equal%20to%201.7%20%28null%20hypothesis%29%20and%20the%20alternative%20hypothesis%20would%20be%20the%20complement%20different%20from%201.7.%20And%20the%20best%20system%20of%20hypothesis%20are%3A%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3ENull%20hypothesis%3A%20%5Btex%5D%5Cmu%20%3D1.7)
Alternative hypothesis [tex]\mu \neq 1.7[/tx]
And the best system of hypothesis are:
3. This two-sided test:
H0: μ = 1.7 mm
H1: μ ≠ 1.7 mm