Answer:
Actualmente estoy trabajando en una pregunta diferente en este momento.
Explanation:
Actualmente estoy trabajando en una pregunta diferente en este momento.
Answer:
R = 31.9 x 10^(6) At/Wb
So option A is correct
Explanation:
Reluctance is obtained by dividing the length of the magnetic path L by the permeability times the cross-sectional area A
Thus; R = L/μA,
Now from the question,
L = 4m
r_1 = 1.75cm = 0.0175m
r_2 = 2.2cm = 0.022m
So Area will be A_2 - A_1
Thus = π(r_2)² - π(r_1)²
A = π(0.0225)² - π(0.0175)²
A = π[0.0002]
A = 6.28 x 10^(-4) m²
We are given that;
L = 4m
μ_steel = 2 x 10^(-4) Wb/At - m
Thus, reluctance is calculated as;
R = 4/(2 x 10^(-4) x 6.28x 10^(-4))
R = 0.319 x 10^(8) At/Wb
R = 31.9 x 10^(6) At/Wb
Answer:
b. the supremacy clause
Explanation:
This is clearly a violation of the supremacy clause of the constitution. The supremacy clause makes the constitution and federal laws made under the constitutional authority the supreme law of the united state. And in a case where there is a conflicting state law, as we have here with Oregon, the federal law is supposed to take priority.
So in this case where the federal law and the state law do not agree, the feral law has the power to override the law of the state. So oregon has violated the supremacy clause
Well this question is though because we have never seen such a thing ! and to be quite frank when that happens , nothing good comes from it. Black Holes
Answer:
What's your question?
Explanation:
I'm not able to understand it....
Sorry.
