No, because there are TWO values of y for a certain value of x
say x=5, then y=2 and y=-2
That does not satisfy the concept of the function.
Answer:
C.
15 votes
Step-by-step explanation:
B= votes Billy got
K = votes Keeton got
B = 3K
B+K =20
Substitute the first equation into the second equation
3K + K =20
Combine like terms
4K =20
Divide both sides by 4
4K/4 = 20/4
K =5
Keeton got 5 votes
B = 3*K
B = 3*5
B = 15 votes
Billy got 15 votes
Answer:
Since the base is the same, we can just multiply the exponents, and when we do so we get y^6.
Answer:
Not Determinable
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplifying
Ln(4x + 1) = 6
Reorder the terms:
nL(1 + 4x) = 6
(1 * nL + 4x * nL) = 6
(1nL + 4nxL) = 6
Solving
1nL + 4nxL = 6
Solving for variable 'n'.
Move all terms containing n to the left, all other terms to the right.
Reorder the terms:
-6 + 1nL + 4nxL = 6 + -6
Combine like terms: 6 + -6 = 0
-6 + 1nL + 4nxL = 0
The solution to this equation could not be determined.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
line of reflection: <em>a fixed line directly in the middle of the pre-image and the reflected image. </em>
perpendicular: <em>two lines meeting at a 90 degree angle</em>
bisector: <em>line that divides something into two equal parts</em>
pre-image: <em>the original figure before any transformation or translation has been made</em>
reflected image: <em>the original image after being reflected across the line of reflection.</em>
<em />
Is the line of reflection a line running perpendicular, directly in the middle of the pre-image and the reflected image? Yes, always would be my answer.