Answer:
-3
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps:)
Answer:
the correct answer is 50 really hope this helped :)
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer would be 16 S'mores and the limiting reactant would be the grahams.
(This is assuming that S'mores would need 2 grahams, 1 marshmallow and 1 chocolate piece.)
Limiting reactant would be the reactant that runs out first.
Let's take your problem into account and see what we have:
48 marshallows
32 grahams (2 x 16 per pack)
45 chocolate pieces (5 x 15 pieces per bar)
Since need 2 of the grahams per S'more then the maximum yield of the grahams is 16 S'mores.
The maximum yield of marshmallows is 48.
The maximum yield of chocolate is 45.
Since you cannot make S'mores without the grahams, then you can only make 16 S'mores before the grahams run out.
Answer:
h(8q²-2q) = 56q² -10q
k(2q²+3q) = 16q² +31q
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Replace x in the function definition with the function's argument, then simplify.
h(x) = 7x +4q
h(8q² -2q) = 7(8q² -2q) +4q = 56q² -14q +4q = 56q² -10q
__
2. Same as the first problem.
k(x) = 8x +7q
k(2q² +3q) = 8(2q² +3q) +7q = 16q² +24q +7q = 16q² +31q
_____
Comment on the problem
In each case, the function definition says the function is not a function of q; it is only a function of x. It is h(x), not h(x, q). Thus the "q" in the function definition should be considered to be a literal not to be affected by any value x may have. It could be considered another way to write z, for example. In that case, the function would evaluate to ...
h(8q² -2q) = 56q² -14q +4z
and replacing q with some value (say, 2) would give 196+4z, a value that still has z as a separate entity.
In short, I believe the offered answers are misleading with respect to how you would treat function definitions in the real world.
