Answer:
Scientists seek to eliminate all forms of bias from their research. However, all scientists also make assumptions of a non-empirical nature about topics such as causality, determinism and reductionism when conducting research. Here, we argue that since these 'philosophical biases' cannot be avoided, they need to be debated critically by scientists and philosophers of science.
Explanation:
Scientists are keen to avoid bias of any kind because they threaten scientific ideals such as objectivity, transparency and rationality. The scientific community has made substantial efforts to detect, explicate and critically examine different types of biases (Sackett, 1979; Ioannidis, 2005; Ioannidis, 2018; Macleod et al., 2015). One example of this is the catalogue of all the biases that affect medical evidence compiled by the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University (catalogueofbias.org). Such awareness is commonly seen as a crucial step towards making science objective, transparent and free from bias.
They go through radioactive decay because when atoms are unstable by going through it they are emitting radiation in natural process and they gain stability by losing energy.
Explanation:
a positively charged nucleus is surrounded by mostly empty space.
According to ideal gas equation, we know for 1 mole of gas: PV=RT
where P = pressure, T = temperature, R = gas constant, V= volume
If '1' and '2' indicates initial and final experimental conditions, we have
Given that: V1 = 100.0 kPa, T1 = 100.0 K, V1 = 2.0 m3, T2 = 400 K, P2 = 200.0 kPa
∴ on rearranging above eq., we get V2 =
∴ V2 = 4 m3
