Answer:
ok jsjajakaka you can come to me when you get home can you please send me the details of the day and I will be there at this time of year is the best way to get a hold of the guy who was the guy who was the guy who was the guy who was the guy who was the guy that was the only thing that was the case but I don't know if I can help you
Answer:
Mass of the climber = 69.38 kg
Explanation:
Change in length
Load, P = m x 9.81 = 9.81m
Young's modulus, Y = 0.37 x 10¹⁰ N/m²
Area
Length, L = 15 m
ΔL = 5.1 cm = 0.051 m
Substituting
Mass of the climber = 69.38 kg
Assume there is a smallest rational integer that has the following form: a/b
Then observe that we can define a/(b+1), which is strictly less than a/b because its divisor is bigger and is rational because it is the product of two numbers. Due to the contradiction created by our original claims that a/b is the smallest rational number that is possible, we might conclude that there is no such thing as the smallest rational number.
There can therefore be no smallest rational number because we may always define a smaller rational number than the one we now possess.
<h3>What is Rational number ?</h3>
Any number that can be expressed as a ratio is considered reasonable. It is therefore possible to represent it as a fraction when the numerator and denominator are both full numbers.
Learn more about Rational number here:
brainly.com/question/12088221
#SPJ4