All categories

2 years ago

Compare the gravitational acceleration on the following objects compared to the Sun using:

Physics

1 answer:

arsen [322]2 years ago

3 0

The gravitational acceleration of White dwarf compared to Sun is 13,675.86.

The gravitational acceleration of Neutron star compared to Sun is 6.79 x 10⁻²⁴.

The gravitational acceleration of Star Betelgeuse compared to Sun is 8.5 x 10¹⁰.

<h3>Mass of the planets</h3>

Mass of sun = 2 x 10³⁰ kg

Mass of white dwarf = 2.765 x 10³⁰ kg

Mass of Neutron star = 5.5 x 10¹² kg

Mass of star Betelgeuse = 2.188 x 10³¹ kg

<h3>Radius of the planets</h3>

Radius of sun = 696,340 km

Radius of white dwarf = 7000 km

Radius of Neutron star = 11 km

Radius of star Betelgeuse = 617.1 x 10⁶ km

<h3>Gravitational acceleration of White dwarf compared to Sun</h3>

$\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = \frac{M(star)}{M(sun)} \times [\frac{R(sun)}{R(star)} ]^2\\\\\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = \frac{2.765 \times 10^{30}}{2\times 10^{30}} \times [\frac{696,340,000}{7,000,000} ]^2\\\\\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = 13,675.86$

<h3>Gravitational acceleration of Neutron star compared to Sun</h3>

$\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = \frac{M(star)}{M(sun)} \times [\frac{R(sun)}{R(star)} ]^2\\\\\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = \frac{5.5 \times 10^{12}}{2\times 10^{30}} \times [\frac{11,000}{7,000,000} ]^2\\\\\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = 6.79\times 10^{-24}$

<h3>Gravitational acceleration of Star Betelgeuse compared to Sun</h3>

$\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = \frac{M(star)}{M(sun)} \times [\frac{R(sun)}{R(star)} ]^2\\\\\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = \frac{2.188 \times 10^{31}}{2\times 10^{30}} \times [\frac{617.1 \times 10^9}{7,000,000} ]^2\\\\\frac{g(star)}{g(sun)} = 8.5\times 10 ^{10}$

Learn more about acceleration due to gravity here: brainly.com/question/88039

You might be interested in

Calculate the magnitude of the average gravitational force between earth and the moon

zepelin [54]

F = G mM / r^2, where
<span>F = gravitational force between the earth and the moon, </span>
<span>G = Universal gravitational constant = 6.67 x 10^(-11) Nm^2/(kg)^2, </span>
<span>m = mass of the moon = 7.36 × 10^(22) kg </span>
<span>M = mass of the earth = 5.9742 × 10^(24) and </span>
<span>r = distance between the earth and the moon = 384,402 km </span>

<span>F </span>
<span>= 6.67 x 10^(-11) * (7.36 × 10^(22) * 5.9742 × 10^(24) / (384,402 )^2 </span>
<span>= 1.985 x 10^(26) N</span>

5 0

3 years ago

The electric potential at a point equidistant from two particles that have charges +Q and –Q is larger than zero. a. smaller tha

Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

idk, idk cause i'm steppin on my toes and i can't stop i make flips ou of my flops

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

If it takes 100 N to get a 10 kg object to accelerate at 10m/s/s, how much force will it take to get a 20 kg object to accelerat

yan [13]

Answer: C) 200 N

Explanation:

The force $F$ is defined as:

$F=m.a$

Where:

$m=20 kg$ is the mass of the object

$a=10 m/s^{2}$ is the acceleration

Then:

$F=(20 kg)(10 m/s^{2})$

Finally:

$F=200 N$

Hence, the correct option is C.

7 0

3 years ago

A small block is attached to an ideal spring and is moving in SHM on a horizontal, frictionless surface. When the amplitude of t

Maslowich

Answer:

a) The time taken to travel from 0.18 m to -0.18m when the amplitude is doubled = 2.76 s

b) The time taken to travel from 0.09 m to -0.09 m when the amplitude is doubled = 0.92 s

Explanation:

a) The period of a simple harmonic motion is given as T = (1/f) = (2π/w)

It is evident that the period doesn't depend on amplitude, that is, it is independent of amplitude.

Hence, the time it would take the block to move from its amplitude point to the negative of the amplitude point (0.09 m to -0.09 m) in the first case will be the same time it will take the block to move from its amplitude point to negative of the amplitude point in the second case (0.18 m to -0.18 m).

Hence, time taken to travel from 0.18 m to -0.18m when the amplitude is doubled is 2.76 s

b) Now that the amplitude has been doubled, the time taken to move from amplitude point to the negative amplitude point in simple harmonic motion, just like with waves, is exactly half of the time period.

The time period is defined as the time taken to complete a whole cycle and a while cycle involves movement from the amplitude to point to the negative amplitude point then fully back to the amplitude point. Hence,

0.5T = 2.76 s

T = 2 × 2.76 = 5.52 s

Note that the displacement of a body undergoing simple harmonic motion from the equilibrium position is given as

y = A cos wt (provided that there's no phase difference, that is, Φ = 0)

A = amplitude = 0.18 m

w = (2π/5.52) = 1.138 rad/s

When y = 0.09 m, the time = t₁₂ = ?

0.09 = 0.18 Cos 1.138t₁ (angles in radians)

Cos 1.138t₁ = 0.5

1.138t₁ = arccos (0.5) = (π/3)

t₁ = π/(3×1.138) = 0.92 s

When y = -0.09 m, the time = t₂ = ?

-0.09 = 0.18 Cos 1.138t₂ (angles in radians)

Cos 1.138t₂ = -0.5

1.138t₂ = arccos (-0.5) = (2π/3)

t₂ = 2π/(3×1.138) = 1.84 s

Time taken to move from y = 0.09 m to y = -0.09 m is then t = t₂ - t₁ = 1.84 - 0.92 = 0.92 s

Hope this Helps!!!

3 0

3 years ago

Why must mine tailings be stored and disposed of carefully?

gavmur [86]

After thorough researching, the mine tailings must be stored and disposed of carefully because they have lots of chemical and various toxic materials. They can also leach to the aquifers. The correct answer to the following given statement above is they have chemicals which are dangerous.

7 0

3 years ago