Gravitational to Kinetic to Chemical
1. For the first one if it doesn't shatter then it is hard.
2. We sould consider that room temperature is usuall<span>y from 18°C (64°F) to 23°C (73°F) and since the melting point of the substance is 40˚C the substance is liquid, because is melting point not an evaporation point it just melts from solid to liquid.
3. Well, in this one we have to consider that a chemical change it change the thing completely. So in this case is baking a cake because the products make the cake stop being them self and created something else.
4. It tends to have low reactivity. This is because viscosity means something like honey very sticky<span> ,</span> density is how hard it is and lastly the conductivity I would believe is to pass electricity or current.
5. It is a physical change because the evaporated water transforms again into water and then fall as rain, snow or ice.
Hope it helped <3</span>
The heat capacity is given by the expression:
When the 
is measured in the calorimeter, we obtain a value, and since we know the mass of the material and we control the change in 
, we can then determine the specific heat "C" by simply remplazing in the expression.
The acceleration of the car in SI units is <u>2.68m/s².</u>
The acceleration is <u>0.27</u> times the acceleration due to gravity g.
Convert the speed in mph into m/s.
1 mile = 1609 m and 1h = 3600 s.
Therefore,
Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity. The car starts from rest , its initial velocity u = 0 and accelerates to a velocity v of 26.82 m/s in 10 s.
Use these values in the equation and calculate the acceleration.
Thus the car accelerates at a rate of <u>2.68 m/s².</u>
The acceleration due to gravity g on Earth has a value 9.81 m/s².
Find the ratio
The car's acceleration is <u>0.27 times the value of g.</u>
The correct answer is A. While the Big Bang is very possible it is still a theory. Even if you accept it, you have to see its flaws. Nothing is without flaw. There are many things it doesn't account for. Now, again this is not to say it is untrue just flawed. The best argument against it or anything similar would be that no one seen it happen.
