Answer:
A characteristic of a good citizen from your list would be C) Helpful
Explanation:
None of the other characteristics would match the traits of a good citizen.
2. Relationship-enhancing.
Distress-maintaining is an attribution that places more responsibility on people for their negative behaviours and less on their positive behaviours. (Ex. Sue’s husband must have forgotten because he doesn’t care about her.) So not this one.
Relationship-enhancing is the opposite. More responsibility for positive and less for negative. (Ex. Sue’s husband is late to their dinner and it must have been the traffic, not his time-management skills.) This is correct.
Observe-biased (aka fundamental attribution error or actor observer bias) is the tendency to judge other people’s behaviour by their personality and your own behaviour by external factors. (Ex. That man honked the horn three times because he’s an angry person but I kicked my desk because my reports were accidentally shredded.) Not this one.
I don’t quite know what insecure attribution is but I believe it is feeling more insecure about yourself when you attribute something to you instead of to external factors. Don’t trust me completely on this one, but I don’t think this is correct.
Although this is a personal question that only you can answer properly, we are still able to provide an example for you.
This is an example of a graphic that might prove to be problematic in certain countries. In Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan or Afghanistan, religion is a very important part of public life. In these countries, people are discouraged from spending much time with members of the opposite sex. Moreover, women in these cultures are expected to be extremely modest and to dress in a conservative way. This graphic does not illustrate such behaviour. Therefore, some people in these nations might find it offensive or inappropriate.
I think its the economy.
Please tell me if I'm wrong, and good luck!
Answer:
The concept that all men are created equal was a key to European Enlightenment philosophy. But the interpretation of "all men" has hovered over the Declaration of Independence since its creation. Although most people have interpreted "all men" to mean humanity, others have argued that Jefferson and the other authors of the Declaration meant to exclude women and children. Within the context of the times it is clear that "all men" was a euphemism for "humanity," and thus those people, such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther King, who used the Declaration of Independence to demand equality for African Americans and women seized the historical as well as the moral high ground
hope this helps, friend!
