1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olin [163]
4 years ago
12

An attacker at the base of a castle wall 3.65 m high throws a rock straight up with speed 7.4m/s from a height of 1.55m above th

e ground.
a) will the rock reach the top?
b) if so what is its speed at the top? if not, what initial speed must it have to reach the top?
c) find the change in speed of a rock thrown straight down from the top of the wall at an initial speed of 7.4 m/s and moving between the same two points.
d) does the change in speed of the downward moving rock agree with the magnitude of the speed change of the rock moving upward between the same elevations?
e) why does this agree or not agree.
Physics
1 answer:
Natali5045456 [20]4 years ago
6 0

a) Yes, the rock will reach the top

b) The final speed is 3.7 m/s

c) The change in speed is 2.4 m/s

d) The change in speed in the two situations do not agree

e) Because the kinetic energy depends quadratically on the speed, K\propto v^2

Explanation:

a)

The mechanical energy of the rock at the moment it is thrown from the ground is equal to the sum of its kinetic energy and its potential energy:

E=KE_i + PE_i = \frac{1}{2}mu^2 + mgh_i

where

m is the mass of the rock

u = 7.4 m/s is the inital speed

g=9.8 m/s^2 is the acceleration of gravity

h_i = 1.55 m is the initial height of the rock

Substituting, we find the initial mechanical energy of the rock

E=\frac{1}{2}m(7.4)^2 + m(9.8)(1.55)=42.6m [J]

In order to reach the top of the castle, the rock should have a mechanical energy of at least

E' = mgh'

where

h' = 3.65 m is the heigth of the top

Substituting,

E'=m(9.8)(3.65)=35.6m [J]

Since E > E', it means that the rock has enough mechanical energy to reach the top.

b)

The final mechanical energy of the rock at the top is

E=mgh'+ \frac{1}{2}mv^2 (1)

where:

v is the final speed of the rock at the top

Since the mechanical energy is conserved, this should be equal to the initial mechanical energy:

E=42.6 m [J] (2)

Therefore, equating (1) and (2), we can find the final speed of the rock:

mgh' + \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = 42.6m\\v=\sqrt{2(42.6-gh')}=\sqrt{2(42.6-(9.8)(3.65))}=3.7 m/s

c)

Since the motion of the rock is a free fall motion (constant acceleration equal to the acceleration of gravity), we can use the following suvat equation:

v^2 - u^2 = 2as

where

v is the final speed, at the bottom

u = 7.4 m/s is the initial speed of the rock, at the top

a=9.8 m/s^2 is the acceleration of gravity

s = 3.65 - 1.55 = 2.1 m is the vertical displacement of the rock

Solving for v, we find the final speed:

v=\sqrt{u^2+2as}=\sqrt{7.4^2 + 2(9.8)(2.1)}=9.8 m/s

Therefore, the change in speed is

\Delta v = v-u = 9.8 - 7.4 =2.4 m/s

d)

In the first situation (rock thrown upward), we have:

u = 7.4 m/s (initial speed)

v = 3.7 m/s (final speed)

So the change in speed is

\Delta v = v-u =3.7 - 7.4 = -3.7 m/s

While the change in speed in the second situation (rock thrown downward) is

\Delta v = 2.4 m/s

Therefore, we see that their magnitudes do not agree.

e)

In both situations, the change in kinetic energy of the rock is equal in magnitude to the change in gravitational potential energy, since the total mechanical energy is conserved.

The change in gravitational potential energy in the two situations is the same (because the change in height is the same), therefore the change in kinetic energy in the two situations is also the same.

However, the kinetic energy of the rock is not directly proportional to the speed, but to the square of the speed:

K\propto v^2

Since the initial speed is the same for both situation (7.4 m/s), but the change in kinetic energy has opposite sign in the two situations (negative when the rock is thrown upward, positive when thrown downward), the situation is not symmetrical, therefore in order to have the same magnitude of change in the kinetic energy, the change in speed must be larger when the kinetic energy involved is lower, so in the first situation.

Learn more about kinetic energy and about potential energy:

brainly.com/question/6536722

brainly.com/question/1198647

brainly.com/question/10770261

#LearnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
I'll give brainliest if you give me a good awnser. :)
lbvjy [14]

Answer:

0.5

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement correctly compares weight and mass?
Varvara68 [4.7K]

Answer:

Option D. Weight varies with location, but mass does not.

Explanation:

To know which option is correct, it is important that we have a background knowledge of mass and weight.

A brief summary of the difference between mass and weight is given below:

1. Mass is the quantity of matter present in an object while weight is the gravitational pull on an object.

2. The SI unit of mass is kilogram Kg) while that of weight is Newton (N)

3. Mass is constant while weight varies by location.

4. Mass can measured using a chemical balance or beam balance while weight can be measured using a lever or spring balance.

With the above information, we can see that mass of an object is always but the weight varies by location.

6 0
4 years ago
If a transformer has a primary with 100 V and fifty coils, and a secondary that yields 20 V, how many coils are on the secondary
melomori [17]
Ideally, if all the magnetic of one winding cuts the other winding, and there isn't any loss in the transformer core or the resistance of the wire, then the voltage across each winding is proportional to the number of turns in its coil.

If you apply 100 V to a winding of 50 turns, then a winding that yields 20 volts
must be wound with

(20/100) of 50 turns = 10 turns
7 0
3 years ago
How Many Significant Digits are in 0.0217​
Bumek [7]

Answer:

<em>The number 0.0217 has 3 significant digits</em>

Explanation:

<u>Significant Digits </u>

These are digits that contribute to the significance of the number. Some rules apply to discard the non-significant digits like:

  • Leading zeros
  • Trailing zeros (with exceptions)

Our number is 0.0217 has two leading zeros before the 2 because they only occupy space to indicate the order of magnitude of the number. Only the 2,1,7 are significant digits, thus

The number 0.0217 has 3 significant digits

7 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLZ
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer: 1200 000 J = 1.2 MJ

Explanation: Ek = 0.5 mv² = 0.5 · 1500 kg· (40 m/s)²

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A background feature called _____ allows you to move the background from the slide border in varying distances by a percentage.
    13·1 answer
  • Six dogs pull a two-person sled with a total mass of 220 kg. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled and the snow i
    5·1 answer
  • What is the function of the Endoplasmic Reticulum?
    12·1 answer
  • I need help ASAP!!!!<br> Which diagram BEST represents a convection heating current?
    5·2 answers
  • What uses electricity
    11·1 answer
  • If a woman weighs 125 lb, her mass expressed in kilograms is x kg, where x is
    9·2 answers
  • A 2.1 ✕ 103-kg car starts from rest at the top of a 5.9-m-long driveway that is inclined at 19° with the horizontal. If an avera
    6·1 answer
  • Determination of the energy imparted to matter by radiation is the subject of ______. A. photometry B. magnification C. dosimetr
    6·1 answer
  • Topics:
    9·1 answer
  • How heat transfer can cause fire to spread?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!