Answer:
Twice
Explanation:
From the formula for velocity in a circle
V= 2πr/T
Where V is velocity
r is raduis
T is period
We see that as r increases V increases so if r is doubled V becomes doubled
The correct answer is A. Charged particles from the sun exite the atmosphere near the poles to create auroras.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
In zero order reactions the rate of reaction is independent of reactant concentrations. That is the rate of the reaction does not vary with increasing nor decreasing reactants concentrations. On the other hand, first order reaction are reactions in which the rate of reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of the reacting substance (reactants). In this case, i believe the rate of reaction will triple( increase by a factor of 3)
