Answer:
Natalia's work is wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
Natalia divided a decimal number by an entire number. Since division is a operation derived from multiplication, the best approach to check if work was good is multiplying the given result by denomination, that is:
1) 
Given.
2) 
Definition of addition.
3) 
Distributive property.
4) 
Definitions of multiplication and decimal number.
5) ![x = 72 +[2\cdot (10)^{-1}]\cdot 12](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%3D%2072%20%2B%5B2%5Ccdot%20%2810%29%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5Ccdot%2012)
Definition of division/Associative property.
6) ![x = 72 + [2\cdot 12]\cdot (10)^{-1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%3D%2072%20%2B%20%5B2%5Ccdot%2012%5D%5Ccdot%20%2810%29%5E%7B-1%7D)
Associative property.
7) 
Definition of multiplication.
8) 
Definition of divsion.
9) 
Defintion of decimal number.
10) 
Definition of addition/Result
Natalia's work is wrong.
perimeter =QR+RS+ST+TU+UQ =26.1
RQ = 5.39
RS = 4.47
ST = 3.61
TU = 4.12
UQ = 8.54
Answer:
The inequality for this would be n ≥ 20.
We know this because it must be larger than 40. We also know it can possibly be equal because the statement says "at least".
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: friend?...
Step-by-step explanation:...
Take 3÷2.6=1.153846repeating. So around $1.15. To check you can take the decimal point times by 2.6 and it will give you three.
