Answer:
The third polarizer can be placed midway between the first two polarizers with its extinction axis at 45° from either polarizer to maximize the amount of light that is transmitted (one-eight).
Explanation:
If light is incident on a polarizer, it allows only light that is parallel to its 'pass-through' axis to pass through untouched.
Light whose electric direction/vector is perpendicular to the 'pass through' axis will not pass through at all. Light whose electric direction/vector points in other directions (apart from those whose direction is parallel or perpendicular) passes through according to the magnitude of the component that is parallel to the 'pass-through' axis.
The polarizer blocks half of the incident light rays and the transmitted light is polarized in the direction of the 'pass-through' axis.
A new polarizer now place at a distance from the first polarizer with its 'pass-through' axis perpendicular to the first polarizer cancel out all the light that comes through from the first polarizer. Since the light electric vector needs to be parallel to the axis of the polarizer to pass through and all the parallelized light from the first polarizer are now incident perpendicularly to the axis of the second polarizer, no light rays pass through.
But, a third polarizer can be placed midway between the first two polarizers with its axis positioned at 45° from either polarizer. Thereby allowing exactly half of the light from the first polarizer to pass through. The explanation is just like that for the first one. (Light whose electric direction/vector points in other directions (apart from those whose direction is parallel or perpendicular) passes through according to the magnitude of the component that is parallel to the 'pass-through' axis).
Then the resultant from the middle polarizer reaches the initial second polarizer and half of the light is let through again. So that, at the end of the day, (1/2) × (1/2) × (1/2) of the initial incident ray is let through.
That is, to maximize the amount of light that is transmitted (one-eight of initial incident ray) the third Polaroid is place midway between the first two and at angle 45° to either one.
Because it is a collection of beliefs mistakenly regarded as being based as specific method
please can i have a brainliest
<h2>
Answer: D. 70.0 J</h2>
Explanation:
3.00 m + 4.00 m = 7.00 m x 10.0 N = 70.0 J
Answer:
a) 20s
b) 500m
Explanation:
Given the initial velocity = 100 m/s, acceleration = -10m/s^2 (since it is moving up, acceleration is negative), and at the maximum height, the ball is not moving so final velocity = 0 m/s.
To find time, we apply the UARM formula:
v final = (a x t) + v initial
Replacing the values gives us:
0 = (-10 x t) + 100
-100 = -10t
t = 10s
It takes 10s for the the ball to reach its max height, but it must also go down so it takes 2 trips, once going up and then another one going down, both of which take the same time to occur
So 10s going up and another 10s going down:
10x2 = 20s
b) Now that we have v final = 0, v initial = 100, a = -10, t = 10s (10s because maximum displacement means the displacement from the ground to the max height) we can easily find the displacement by applying the second formula of UARM:
Δy = (1/2)(a)(t^2) + (v initial)(t)
Replacing the values gives us:
Δy = (1/2)(-10)(10^2) + (100)(10)
= (-5)(100) + 1000
= -500 + 1000
= 500 m
Hope this helps, brainliest would be appreciated :)
