Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.
The number of valence electrons of an element can be determined by the periodic table group (vertical column) in which the element is categorized
The postulate of Dalton's atomic theory which is a result of the law of conservation of mass is: Atoms are indivisible particles, which can neither be created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction.
Trick question: you just stated everything in the beakers.
HEY BUDDY THE ANSWER IS
It processes the environment and sends out signals.
