The energy carried by the incident light is
where h is the Planck constant and f is the frequency of the light. The threshold frequency is the frequency that corresponds to the minimum energy needed to eject the electrons from the metal, so if we substitute the threshold frequency in the formula, we get the minimum energy the light must have to eject the electrons:
A billiard ball collides with a stationary identical billiard ball to make it move. If the collision is perfectly elastic, the first ball comes to rest after collision.
<h3>Why does the first ball comes to rest after collision ?</h3>
Let m be the mass of the two identical balls.
u1 = velocity before the collision of ball 1
u2 = 0 = velocity of second ball that is at rest
v1 and v2 are the velocities of the balls after the collision.
From the conservation of momentum,
∴ mu1 + mu2 = mv1 + mv2
∴ mu1 = mv1 + mv2
∴ u1 = v1 + v2
In an elastic collision, the kinetic energy of the system before and after collision remains same.
∴
∴
∴ ₁₂ = 0
- It is impossible for the mass to be zero.
- Because the second ball moves, velocity v2 cannot be zero.
- As a result, the velocity of the first ball, v1, is zero, indicating that it comes to rest after collision.
<h3>What is collision ?</h3>
An elastic collision is a collision between two bodies in which the total kinetic energy of the two bodies remains constant. There is no net transfer of kinetic energy into other forms such as heat, noise, or potential energy in an ideal, fully elastic collision.
Can learn more about elastic collision from brainly.com/question/12644900
#SPJ4
It is indeed true that scientists have known about the background radiation (commonly known as the Cosmic Microwave Background) since the early 60s. It was first discovered quite by accident by Penzias and Wilson working at Bell Labs, who detected it as an unexplainable interference in their precision radio equipment. When people finally figured out exactly what it was they were seeing, they won the Nobel Prize for their discovery. Only a few years before, George Gamow had predicted that if the Big Bang theory were correct, we should observe just such a background radiation. The CMB is not the only evidence in favor of the Big Bang, but it is one of the most important. It is a natural consequence of the theory, and is pretty unexplainable in steady-state cosmology.
The 15-20 billion year number comes not from the CMB, but rather predominantly from measurements of nearby and distant galaxies, particularly their rates of expansion away from us. We find that the distance to a galaxy is proportional to its recessional velocity. The constant of proportionality is the Hubble Constant, H, which turns out to be (approximately) the reciprocal of the age of the universe. So we measure the age by measuring recessional velocities. T = 1/H is only true, however, if the universe is not significantly accelerating or decelerating its expansion rate. If the rate of expansion is rapidly accelerating, the universe may be older than 1/H = 15 billion years, give or take. Such an acceleration would be caused by a large value of the Cosmological Constant, a sort of anti-gravity force predicted by General Relativity. There is some evidence that this might be the case.
So finally, yes, the age of the universe, being based on the empirical determination of H, is based on the observed evidence.
Answer:
By pushing the pendulum Bob up so it moves faster
Explanation:
In pendulum physics the length of the pendulum Bob determines the speed of the clock. So since the grandfather's clock is slow it means the Bob is has moved down so to move it up you have to achieve this by adjusting the but upwards thereby making the clock move faster.