Answer:
A testable proposition or prediction is a <u>hypothesis</u>; while an explanation using an integrated set of principles that organizes observations and predicts behaviors or events is a <u>theory</u>.
Explanation:
The hypothesis is a proposition that establishes a relationship between the facts: a hypothesis is the establishment of a link between the facts that the researcher clarifies to the extent that he can generate logical explanations of why this link occurs.A theory is a set of interrelated structures (concepts, definitions and propositions) that present a systematic perspective of the phenomena specifying the relationships. It is the main objective of science, it is a combination that is projected in a systematic perspective of the phenomena in order to describe, explain, predict and control the phenomena.
Answer:
A:3, B:1, C:2
Explanation:
1. Concurrent jurisdiction: Cases involving state and federal questions and cases.
2. Exclusive state jurisdiction: Cases involving all matters not subject to federal jurisdiction.
3. Exclusive federal jurisdiction: Cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Concurrent jurisdiction arises in cases which can be heard in more than one court, it allows more than one court the authority to hear a case, for example divorce cases can be heard in a local district level court, a family court or any one of the district courts
Federal jurisdiction arise in cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Exclusive state jurisdiction arises in cases not subject to federal laws but state laws
The subordinate clause is less import than the main clause so the answer is true
