1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mkey [24]
1 year ago
13

An access control method based on an object's owner and permissions granted by the owner is referred to as:_________

Social Studies
1 answer:
aniked [119]1 year ago
7 0

An access control method based on an object's owner and permissions granted by the owner is referred to as discretionary access control (DAC).

<h3>Who is the owner?</h3>

An owner can be defined as the person who is the writer of ownership of a particular product or asset, the owner decides what to do with the particular product and takes all the decisions related to that.

In DAC, the accessibility is given to a limited number of people.

Discretionary access control is a technique for blocking accessibility dependent on the proprietor of an asset as well as the rights that owner has provided.

Learn more about the owner, here:

brainly.com/question/16100511

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
What are the three parts of the Georgia Constitution (in order)?
Veseljchak [2.6K]
Preamble
I Bill of Rights
II Voting and Elections
III Legislative Branch
IV Constitutional Boards and Commissions
V Executive Branch
VI Judicial Branch
VII Taxation and Finance
VIII Education
IX Counties and Municipal Corporations
X Amendments to the Constitution
XI Miscellaneous Provisions
5 0
3 years ago
I need one big paragraph about why duty ethics is bad ?PLEASE
gladu [14]
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>

...it is hard to believe that it could ever 

8 0
3 years ago
.A business user wants a quick way to edit a record's status and enter a custom due date field from the record's feed in Salesfo
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

A. Custom action

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the tool that can be used to accomplish this is a Custom action. This term refers to any action that is completely user defined. Meaning that the user can choose what that action does and are used in many programs and applications, even mobile apps such as the one in this scenario.

3 0
3 years ago
Which best describes a role of animals in the water cycle?
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

D - They release water vapor when they exhale.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give an example of how the United States has handled an international conflict. Did it involve any international organizations?
docker41 [41]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

However, trying to help you, we can say the following.

Usually, the United States has handled international conflict using the force of its military presence worldwide or at least threatening to use it. The exception was the period known as the Cold War, in which the US knew that it cannot directly confront the Soviet Union because the USSR was as militarily powerful as the United States.

During the Cold War Years, both countries competed in the arms race, the space race, and the spread/containment of Communism around the world.

Did it involve any international organizations?

Yes, sometimes, and accordingly with US interests, it has involved the United Nations, but mostly, NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, trying to get the military support of countries such as Great Britain, France, Canada, among others.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Psychologist Robert "Sternberg", an expert on creativity and intelligence, advises that if you want to be more creative, you sho
    12·1 answer
  • Is citizenship a controversial issue
    7·2 answers
  • What did people do to fix the plains after black sunday
    14·2 answers
  • Ralph has a confederate cut in front of a person who is second or ninth in line at a grocery store checkout counter. He then rec
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a land resource?
    8·2 answers
  • Alex is a 4 year old preschool student whose hamster just died. All of the following are common reactions to the hamster's death
    11·1 answer
  • How do you say Idiot in french?​
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement correctly describes a parliamentary democracy?
    10·2 answers
  • Why do the tides go in and out
    13·1 answer
  • The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor because….
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!