<span>Hotdogs - Meat processing stores
Buns - Bakeries
Condiments - Grocery stores
Electricity - Electric company
Paper plates and napkins - Grocery stores
We will be economically interdependent when we open our hotdog stand with the sources of the items listed above because we will be buying products or services from them. We will spending money to continue our small business and the money we use to pay them will make them continue to serve their customers or clients.</span>
Answer:
Prepare and train the employee
Explanation:
These measures of stemming the nervous act of the employee based on changes in the workplace are based on the way in which the change might result from. A change can come as a result of take over of the company,merger or downsizing the work force.
In preparing and training of employee,the company must ensure that employees learn new skills or go for courses on how they can adhere to new development in the line of change targeted.
There are other methods which includes challenging the employee for positive change, ability to provide solutions, display of real concern about helping the employee.
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
