About 15 mpg is your answer
The light-collecting area of the 10-meter Keck telescope is <u>4 times greater </u>than the light-collecting area of the 5-meter Hale telescope.
Why?
We can calculate the light-collecting area of a telescope by using its diameter/radius. To do that, we can use the following formula:
Now, to know how much greater is the collecting area of the 10-meter keck telescope compared to the collecting area of the 5-meter hale telescope, we need to calculate their light-collecting areas and compare them.
For the 10-meter keck telescope, we have:
For the 5-meter hale telescope, we have:
Now, comparing the areas, we have:
Hence, we have that the light-collecting area of the 10-meter keck telescope is 4 times greater than the light-collecting area of the 5-meter hale telescope.
Have a nice day!
True
From what Ive learned its like how you create your own hypothesis for a science experiment it may not work completely that way but you learn what didnt work and what does work
Answer:If the Earth stopped spinning suddenly, the atmosphere would still be in motion with the Earth's original 1100 mile per hour rotation speed at the equator. All of the land masses would be scoured clean of anything not attached to bedrock.
Explanation:
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter b.
Ex is negative from x = -2 to x = 0, and positive from x = 0 to x = 2 <span>correctly describes the orientation of the x-component of the electric field along the x-axis.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!