All categories

1 year ago

Why can't we say a measurement tool is accurate?

1 answer:

7 0

There are various reasons why a measurement tool cannot be accurate. One of them is thermal contraction and expansion varies according to seasons.

<h3>What are Accuracy and Precision?</h3>

There are two ways to assess observational error: accuracy and precision. Precision measures how closely two measurements are to one another, whereas accuracy measures how close a group of measurements is to its actual value. In other words, precision is a measure of statistical variability and a description of random errors.

We can say that a tool can be precise, but it cannot be accurate. There are various reasons behind that, some of them are :

It may not be calibrated properly. If there are no reliable standards to use for calibration, this may occur.
Perhaps it strayed. This is why electronic scales include a tare function—they are terrible in this area.
Perhaps the measurements are not linear. Our calipers might have been quite precise at the 2-inch standard, where they were calibrated, but inaccurate at other dimensions.
Temperature is one environmental component that the instrument might be sensitive to. These effects might be compensated for, but the compensation might not be ideal. This issue affects both dissolved solids meters and picometers.

These are some of the reasons due to which measurement tool cannot be accurate.

To get more information about Accuracy and Precision :

brainly.com/question/15276983

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Suppose that you have a 680 Ω, a 720 Ω and a 1.20 kΩ resistor. (a) What is the maximum resistance you can obtain by combining th

Delvig [45]

Explanation:

As the given data is as follows.

$R_{1} = 680 \ohm$ ohm $\ohm$ , $R_{2} = 720 \ohm$ ohm,

$R_{3} = 1.2 k\ohm$ = 1200 $\ohm$ (as 1 k ohm = 1000 m)

(a) We will calculate the maximum resistance by combining the given resistances as follows.

Max. Resistance = $R_{1} + R_{2} + R_{3}$

= $(680 + 720 + 1200) \ohm$ ohm

= 2600 ohm

or, = 2.6 $k\ohm$ ohm

Therefore, the maximum resistance you can obtain by combining these is 2.6 $k\ohm$ ohm.

(b) Now, the minimum resistance is calculated as follows.

Min. Resistance = $\frac{1}{R_{1}} + \frac{1}{R_{2}} + \frac{1}{R_{3}}$

= $\frac{1}{680} + \frac{1}{720} + \frac{1}{1200}$

= $3.683 \times 10^{-3}$ ohm

Hence, we can conclude that minimum resistance you can obtain by combining these is $3.683 \times 10^{-3}$ ohm.

3 0

3 years ago

Which one is an accurate description of the process of erosion?

AURORKA [14]

The accurate description of the process of erosion is when <span>moving bits of rock and soil across the earth’s surface by water, wind, or glaciers. The answer is letter C.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Calculate the acceleration of a 90-kg skydiver with a net force of -883 N

Helen [10]

F=ma, in this case your force=-883 N and mass = 90 kg. F/m=a therefore acceleration=-883/90=-9.81 m/s/s

6 0

4 years ago

Two friends are playing a version of proton golf where the hole is marked by a single proton. The first friend reads his meter,

yarga [219]

Answer:

the electric field strength on the second one is 2.67 N/C.

Explanation:

the electric fiel on the first one is:

E1 = k×q/(r^2)

r^2 = k×q/(E1)

= (9×10^9)×(q)/(24.0)

= 375000000q

then the electric field on the second one is:

E2 = k×q/(R^2)

we know that R = 3r

R^2 = 9×r^2

E2 = k×q/(9×r^2)

= k×q/(9×375000000q)

= k/(9×375000000)

= (9×10^9)/(9×375000000)

= 2.67 N/C

Therefore, the electric field strength on the second one is 2.67 N/C.

5 0

3 years ago

Why are peer reviews important?

Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

Peer reviews are important because individuals with similar background knowledge are used to review work to detect inaccuracies or deficiencies in the work.

Explanation:

Those individuals with similar educational and work background knowledge can more accurately review work since they have the required knowledge base for the subject.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers