"with the wind" is a tail-wind, and the speeds are added to get the groundspeed.
"against the wind" is a head-wind, and the windspeed is subtracted from the airspeed.
Answer: The infra red waves is located between microwave and visible light based on their WAVELENGTH and FREQUENCY of occurrence.
Explanation:
Electromagnetic waves are those waves that do not require or need a material medium for its propagation, but they are able to travel through a vacuum. They exhibit or show all properties associated or connected with light. They are undeflected in electric and magnetic fields. These electromagnetic waves are arranged in order of their FREQUENCY and WAVELENGTHS which is known as ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM.
FREQUENCY is defined as the number of cycles which the wave completes in one second and is measured in Hertz(Hz). While WAVELENGTH is defined as the distance between two successive crests or troughs of waves which is measured in meter (m).
The electromagnetic spectrum is made up of the following rays which is arranged from the biggest wavelengths to the smallest:
--> Radiowaves
--> microwave :
--> infrared rays:
--> visible light:
--> ultraviolet rays
--> x-rays and
--> Gamma rays.
According to the arrangement of the spectrum above, the microwave has a higher wavelength and frequency than the infrared rays, while the visible light has a lower wavelength and frequency than the infrared rays.
Answer:
hello your question is incomplete attached below is the missing part
answer : short period oscillations frequency = 0.063 rad / sec
phugoid oscillations natural frequency ( 
) = 4.27 rad/sec
Explanation:
first we have to state the general form of the equation
= 
where :
comparing the general form with the given equation
= 18.2329
hence the short period oscillation frequency ( 
) = 0.063 rad/sec
phugoid oscillations natural frequency ( ) = 4.27 rad/sec
Answer:
it bc the adults are bigger then us kid so when they dip in the pool it makes bigger splashes
Explanation:
Answer:
The statement is incorrect because, a force acting on an object does not necessarily have to produce motion.
People have the misconception that when a force acts on an object it always produces motion
Explanation:
The statement is incorrect because, a force acting on an object does not necessarily have to produce motion. It could be in static equilibrium where the net force is zero and produces not motion. The body could also be in dynamic equilibrium when no net force acts on it moving at a constant velocity. But here we are concerned with static equilibrium since the body does not move at all.
People have the misconception that when a force acts on an object it always produces motion and, we have seen from the above tat its not always true.
