Complete Question
The diagram for this question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
a E =
b E =
c E = 0 N/C
d 
e 
f V = 
g 
h 
i 
Explanation:
From the question we are given that
The first charge 
The second charge 
The first radius 
The second radius 

And ![Potential \ Difference = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1 }{r}+\frac{q_2}{R_2} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Potential%20%5C%20Difference%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%20%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%20%7D%7Br%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%5D)
The objective is to obtain the the magnitude of electric for different cases
And the potential difference for other cases
Considering a
r = 4.00 m


Considering b

This implies that the electric field would be

This because it the electric filed of the charge which is below it in distance that it would feel

= 
Considering c
r = 0.200 m
=> 
The electric field = 0
This is because the both charge are above it in terms of distance so it wont feel the effect of their electric field
Considering d
r = 4.00 m
=> 
Now the potential difference is

This so because the distance between the charge we are considering is further than the two charges given
Considering e
r = 1.00 m 
![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} \frac{1.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 26.79 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2026.79%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering f

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.700} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 34.67 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.700%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2034.67%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering g

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering h

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7BR_1%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering i

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7BR_1%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Friction occurs between two contacting surfaces. The coefficient of friction is very much dependent on the roughness of these surfaces. Some of the many ways in which the coefficient can be lessened or decreased are to lubricate the surface or make it shiny by eliminating the spikes which caused the roughness.
False the correct answer is chemical bonds instead of thermal energy
Answer:
I think it is meteorologist because they also study of the atmosphere, atmospheric phenomena, and atmospheric effects on our weather.
Answer: 0.5
Explanation:
The modulus of elasticity (called <em>"alargamiento unitario"</em> in spanish)
of a spring is given by the following formula:
Where:
is the original length of the spring
is the elongation of the spring, being
the length of the spring after a force is applied to it.
Then: