Answer:
it can allow more room for additional living things in the habitat
Explanation:
Use water for an example.
- Taking water can destroy a fish habitat.
- Using excess water can cause water to run out.
- Taking/using water leaves less amounts for others/organisms.
Taking water does not allow additional room for organisms in a habitat.
Light does not travel at a constant speed in a vacuum, compared to in air, because the light is being absorbed by atoms and molecules in the air. But light does travel at a constant speed in a vacuum.
So I agree with A
All that talk about moving forward is irrelevant (I think)
The statement “Only the “Conclusion” section discusses whether the original hypothesis was supported, and both sections suggest further research”, best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer: Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In research, we do experiments and derive the results. Then, those results were analyzed by us. In this analysis part, we compare our results with the related results published elsewhere. Also, we correlate the similarities and point out the differences between our analysis and other reported results.
In conclusion part, we have to check hypothesis or it supported. And, we summarise our analysis and figure out the further research need to be done on that to improvise our research. So, the final statement is the correct option which best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer:
A= Metallic
B= Conducts electricity as a solid
C= Covalent
D=Does not conduct electricity
Explanation:
