All categories

3 years ago

Which statement accurately describes global warming?

Chemistry

2 answers:

NNADVOKAT [17]3 years ago

7 0

I would say your answer is C, or the last one. Hope it helps

Anton [14]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The answer is C i just took the test and got it correct

You might be interested in

Cuales elementos tienen solo un electrón de valencia

aleksley [76]

Answer:

En el caso del sodio, la valencia es 1, ya que tiene un solo electrón de valencia, si pierde un electrón se queda con el último nivel completo.

Explanation:

Grupo de la tabla periódica Electrones de valencia

Grupo 14 (IV) (Grupo del carbono) 4

Grupo 15 (V) (Grupo del nitrógeno ) 5

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is NOT a unit of energy?

kap26 [50]

Answer:

Degree Celsius

8 0

3 years ago

Why is space cold ???

Norma-Jean [14]

Because the space is ultimate thermos.

4 0

3 years ago

The empirical formula of a compound is CH2O and its molecular weight is 90.09 g/mol. Determine the molecular formula.

Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer : The molecular formula of the compound will be, $C_{3}H_{6}O_3$

Explanation :

Empirical formula : It is the simplest form of the chemical formula which depicts the whole number of atoms of each element present in the compound.

Molecular formula : it is the chemical formula which depicts the actual number of atoms of each element present in the compound.

For determining the molecular formula, we need to determine the valency which is multiplied by each element to get the molecular formula.

The equation used to calculate the valency is :

$n=\frac{\text{molecular mass}}{\text{empirical mass}}$

As we are given that the empirical formula of a compound is $CH_2O$ and the molar mass of compound is, 90.09 gram/mol.

The empirical mass of $CH_2O$ = 1(12) + 2(1) + 1(16) = 30 g/eq

$n=\frac{\text{molecular mass}}{\text{empirical mass}}$

$n=\frac{90.09}{30}=3$

Molecular formula = $(CH_2O)_n=(CH_2O)_3=C_{3}H_{6}O_3$

Thus, the molecular formula of the compound will be, $C_{3}H_{6}O_3$

7 0

4 years ago

Would an earthquake support the principle of uniformitarianism or the principle of catastrophism? Explain.

liberstina [14]

Question: Would an earthquake support the principle of uniformitarianism or the principle of catastrophism? Explain.

Answer: Catastrophism was the theory that the Earth had largely been shaped by sudden, short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope. This was in contrast to uniformitarianism (sometimes described as gradualism), in which slow incremental changes, such as erosion, created all the Earth's geological features.

Hope this helps, have a good day. c;

3 0

3 years ago