Answer:
Kf > Ka = Kb > Kc > Kd > Ke
Explanation:
We can apply
E₀ = E₁
where
E₀: Mechanical energy at the beginning of the motion (top of the incline)
E₁: Mechanical energy at the end (bottom of the incline)
then
K₀ + U₀ = K₁ + U₁
If v₀ = 0 ⇒ K₀
and h₁ = 0 ⇒ U₁ = 0
we get
U₀ = K₁
U₀ = m*g*h₀ = K₁
we apply the same equation in each case
a) U₀ = K₁ = m*g*h₀ = 70 Kg*9.81 m/s²*8m = 5493.60 J
b) U₀ = K₁ = m*g*h₀ = 70 Kg*9.81 m/s²*8m = 5493.60 J
c) U₀ = K₁ = m*g*h₀ = 35 Kg*9.81 m/s²*4m = 1373.40 J
d) U₀ = K₁ = m*g*h₀ = 7 Kg*9.81 m/s²*16m = 1098.72 J
e) U₀ = K₁ = m*g*h₀ = 7 Kg*9.81 m/s²*4m = 274.68 J
f) U₀ = K₁ = m*g*h₀ = 105 Kg*9.81 m/s²*6m = 6180.30 J
finally, we can say that
Kf > Ka = Kb > Kc > Kd > Ke
The statement would be False. T<span>he potential energy of a membrane potential comes solely from the difference in electrical charge across the membrane. In addition to that, membrane potential actually regulates the potential difference of nerve cells across the membrane estimated at 70 mV.</span>
<h3>Answer</h3>
6.6 N pointing to the right
<h3>Explanation</h3>
Given that,
two forces acting of magnitude 3.6N
angle between them = 48°
To find,
the third force that will cause the object to be in equilibrium
<h3>1)</h3>
Find the vertical and horizontal components of the two forces
vertical force1 = sin(24)(3.6)
vertical force2= -sin(24)(3.6)
<em>(negative sign since it is acting on opposite direction)</em>
vertical force3 = sin(24)(3.6) - sin(24)(3.6)
= 0
<h3>2)</h3>
horizontal force1 = cos(24)(3.6)
horizontal force2= cos(24)(3.6)
horizontal force3 = cos(24)(3.6) + cos(24)(3.6)
= 2(cos(24)(3.6))
= 6.5775 N
≈ 6.6 N
<em />
<em />
Answer:
a) x = (0.0114 ± 0.0001) in
, b) the number of decks is 5
Explanation:
a) The thickness of the deck of cards (d) is measured and the thickness of a card (x) is calculated
x = d / 52
x = 0.590 / 52
x = 0.011346 in
Let's look for uncertainty
Δx = dx /dd Δd
Δx = 1/52 Δd
Δx = 1/52 0.005
Δx = 0.0001 in
The result of the calculation is
x = (0.0114 ± 0.0001) in
b) You want to reduce the error to Δx = 0.00002, the number of cards to be measured is
#_cards = n 52
The formula for thickness is
x = d / n 52
Uncertainty
Δx = 1 / n 52 Δd
n = 1/52 Δd / Δx
n = 1/52 0.005 / 0.00002
n = 4.8
Since the number of decks must be an integer the number of decks is 5
Answer:
I do not think that it is the most reliable way to gain information since it is very hard to do and can be easily messed up. No, I don't think you can charge someone on only evidence from blood spatter, but if there was additional evidence I think that this would definitely help with the case but not on its own, since it doesn’t give you physical evidence about the suspect.
Explanation:
