The nucleons(protons and neutrons) are held together by means of this strong force. If this strong never existed, all the nucleus will blow themselves due to strong repulsive force between protons(neutron has no charge).
Thats it!
If I explain beyond, it will surely bounce off your head. Anyways, if you wanna know more bout it, ping me. (:
Answer:
Heat can travel from one place to another in three ways: Conduction, Convection and Radiation. Both conduction and convection require matter to transfer heat. If there is a temperature difference between two systems heat will always find a way to transfer from the higher to lower system.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Imagine an object is moving in one dimension on a number line, and for this we'll say that the numbers on the line are a metre apart. If the object moves from 2 m to 7 m, the change in position is 7-2=+5 metres. But if the object moves back from 7 m to 2 m, the change in position is 2-7=-5 metres. since
, and time is always positive, velocity will be positive in one direction and negative in the other direction.
a. The risk of injury must be predictable.
b. A "breach of duty" is when a professional fails to uphold a level of care.
c. There must be a standard of care in place, and the practitioner must assume responsibility for the patient.
d. There must be a clear link between the treatment received and the harm.
<h3>What is malpractice?</h3>
Malpractice, commonly referred to as professional negligence, is defined as "an incident of carelessness or incompetence on the part of a professional" under tort law.
The following professionals might be the target of malpractice claims:
Medical professionals: If a doctor or other healthcare practitioner does not exercise the level of care and competence that a similarly situated professional in the same medical field would deliver under the circumstances, a medical malpractice claim may be made against them.
Lawyers: Failure to provide services with the amount of competence, care, and diligence that a reasonable lawyer would use in the same situation may be grounds for a legal malpractice claim.
To know more about malpractice, visit;
brainly.com/question/25441985
#SPJ4
Answer:
the wagon should be used as frame of reference if an observer said the child was not moving.
Explanation:
The state of motion of a body depends upon the frame of reference. It is the set of co-ordinates according to which the motion is analyzed. If a child is riding in a wagon, then he will be considered in motion to a person standing outside the wagon. Hence, if we take a frame of reference outside the wagon then the child must be in motion with respect to the observer. On the other hand if the observer is inside the wagon, then the child must be in rest with respect to the observer. Hence, if we take the wagon to be the frame of reference, then the child will be at rest with respect to the observer.
<u>Therefore, the wagon should be used as frame of reference if an observer said the child was not moving.</u>
