Explanation:
Molar mass of
= 39.1 + 35.5 + 3(16.0) = 122.6 g
Molar mass of KCl = 39.1 + 35.5 = 74.6 g
Molar mass of
= 32.0 g
According to the equation, 2 moles of
reacts to give 3 moles of oxygen.
Therefore, 2 (122.6) = 245.2 g of
will give 3 (32.0) = 96.0 g of oxygen. Thus, 245.2 g of
gives 96.0 g of oxygen.
(a) Calculate the amount of oxygen given by 2.72 g of
as follows.
of
(b) Calculate the amount of oxygen given by 0.361 g of
as follows.
of
c) Calculate the amount of oxygen given by 83.6 kg
as follows.
of data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f473/5f473314755938f97e1eadf16f12c3084970434f" alt="O_{2}"
Convert kg into grams as follows.
= 32731 g of data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f473/5f473314755938f97e1eadf16f12c3084970434f" alt="O_{2}"
(d) Calculate the amount of oxygen given by 22.5 mg of
as follows.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae964/ae9646c83febd3fe9baa39431b8aca559a8cdf0a" alt="\frac {96g}{245.2g} \times 22.5 mg = 8.79 mg"
Convert mg into grams as follows.
of data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f473/5f473314755938f97e1eadf16f12c3084970434f" alt="O_{2}"
That is actually physics because it talks about motion.
Of what?
Attach a link or pic
Answer:
Photosynthesis is the transformation of radiant energy to chemical energy. Plants take in water, carbon dioxide, and sunlight and turn them into glucose and oxygen. Called photosynthesis, one of the results of this process is that carbon dioxide is removed from the air.
Explanation:
<span>Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. Several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. It is either that they revise their study or replicate the study. Most scientists would revisit their work and the findings they had from their research. Most probable if they were successful and the comments of the publisher and the co-scientists were positive they could replicate the study to validate its accountability.<span>
</span></span>