Split and merge into it. While they are alive, carbon returns from animals into water through waste products from respiration and defecation/urination. Another way when they are dead is from decaying remains. While they are alive, carbon returns from animals into water through waste products from respiration and defecation/urination.
Good enough?
Answer:
1.98x10⁻¹² kg
Explanation:
The <em>energy of a photon</em> is given by:
h is Planck's constant, 6.626x10⁻³⁴ J·s
c is the speed of light, 3x10⁸ m/s
and λ is the wavelenght, 671 nm (or 6.71x10⁻⁷m)
- E = 6.626x10⁻³⁴ J·s * 3x10⁸ m/s ÷ 6.71x10⁻⁷m = 2.96x10⁻¹⁹ J
Now we multiply that value by <em>Avogadro's number</em>, to <u>calculate the energy of 1 mol of such protons</u>:
- 1 mol = 6.023x10²³ photons
- 2.96x10⁻¹⁹ J * 6.023x10²³ = 1.78x10⁵ J
Finally we <u>calculate the mass equivalence</u> using the equation:
- m = 1.78x10⁵ J / (3x10⁸ m/s)² = 1.98x10⁻¹² kg
Great question, but I believe you are mixing up atomic number with mass number. Assuming you are, 12.011 amu is the average mass of a carbon atom. For carbon, it can come in three forms: carbon-12, carbon-13, carbon-14. The number following carbon is the mass number of that particular carbon "isotope". The reason the average is so close to 12 is because carbon-12 is by far the most common, so the average should be (and is) very close to 12. Therefore, 12.011 is a weighted average of all carbon molecules, and carbon-14 is a particular carbon molecule that weighs 14 amu.
Answer:
4.90 moles of 
will produce (9.8) moles of 
,
(4.90) moles of 
and
(39.2) moles of 
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The number of moles of is 
The formation reaction of is
From the reaction we see that
1 mole of is formed by 2 moles of 1 mole of and 4
This implies that
4.90 moles of will produce (2 * 4.90) moles of ,
(1 * 4.90) moles of and
(8 * 4.90) moles of
So
4.90 moles of will produce (9.8) moles of ,
(4.90) moles of and
(39.2) moles of
A civilização egípcia se desenvolveu ao longo do rio Nilo em grande parte porque as enchentes anuais do rio garantiam um solo rico e confiável para o cultivo.
