1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KatRina [158]
3 years ago
6

Why was a government with three branches considered to be a compromise

Social Studies
1 answer:
goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
5 0
By having three separate, independent branches of government (the executive, legislative and judicial) a society has a "balance of power" which means that no one branch can have too much power and become tyrannical. Therefore each of the three branches is compromising.  
You might be interested in
An interview would be conducted when
puteri [66]

Answer:

The correct response is Option B: Detailed in-depth information is needed.

Explanation:

Of the options provided the best reason for choosing interviews as your research methodology is that the study is aimed at gleaning detailed information on a subject and there needs to be an effort to dive deep into the data. The disadvantage of this method is that it tends to be time-consuming and the analysis needs to be done more manually than the results of a survey. Surveys are more amenable to using software and running statistical analyses although some software exists for helping to analyze qualitative data as well. Interviews can also be useful for uncomfortable subjects although in some populations they may prefer the anonymity of a survey if the research is on a sensitive subject.  

5 0
2 years ago
What followed shortly after saddam hussein's removal from power?
tatuchka [14]

The correct answer is letter C

Explanation: Chemical weapons were used against Iranian soldiers during the Iraqi war against Iran but they were not used on civilians once Hussein was knocked from power.

3 0
3 years ago
How does previous political experience and perceived perception by American voters influence elections?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

When asked which statement comes closer to their own views, most Americans (58%) say that “voting gives people like me some say about how government runs things,” while fewer (39%) say “voting by people like me doesn’t really affect how government runs things.”

The public is somewhat more skeptical when it comes to the ability of ordinary citizens to influence the government in Washington. Half (50%) say ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort, while about as many (47%) say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do to influence the government.

Can ordinary people have an impact?

Majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners as well as of Republicans and Republican leaners say that voting gives people some say in government, though this view is somewhat more widely held among Democrats (63%) than Republicans (56%).Those with more education are more likely to say voting gives them a voice in government

Democrats are similarly more likely than Republicans to say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington: 55% of Democrats say ordinary citizens can make an impact, while 42% say there is not much ordinary people can do. About as many Republicans and leaners say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington (47%) as say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do (51%).

Among the 13% of the public that does not identify or lean toward either party – a group that is far less likely to be registered to vote – just 44% say voting gives people some say in how government runs things, while 49% say it doesn’t really affect how government runs things.

Seven-in-ten of those with a post-graduate degree (70%) and 65% of those with a college degree say voting gives people some say in government; somewhat smaller shares of those with only some college experience (58%) or those with no more than a high school diploma (51%) say the same.

Unlike views on voting, there are no educational differences in the shares saying ordinary people can influence government if they make the effort.Scale of political efficacy

Blacks (58%) and Hispanics (57%) are more likely than whites (47%) to say that ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington, if they’re willing to make the effort. There are no racial differences in views of the impact of voting.

These two measures of opinion on the impact of voting and on ordinary citizens’ ability to influence the government in Washington can be combined to create a scale of political efficacy. Those who rank “high” on the scale say both that voting gives people some say in how government runs things and that ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort. “Medium” political efficacy includes those who hold only one of the two views, while “low” political efficacy describes those who do not hold either view.

Overall, 39% of the public falls into the high political efficacy category, while 33% have medium political efficacy and 28% have low political efficacy.

Political efficacy is higher among those with more education. For example, 47% of those with a post-graduate degree rank high on the scale of political efficacy, compared with 33% of those with no more than a high school diploma.

5 0
3 years ago
Why is there conflict in kashmir​
Oksanka [162]

The conflict in Kashmir is about to the authority of princely state Jammu and Kashmir in between India and Pakistan.

Explanation:

India and Pakistan have fought several times for Jammu and Kashmir. In 1947, 1965 and 1971 the war took place and caused death of military armed force, many soldiers of army and defense including BSF, CRPF etc. Presently it's nonetheless a threat to live there for common people who are always under fear of bomb blast, firing etc.

Mainly its a territorial conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir region. China is also involved in this conflict. For the conflict and unrest Laskar-I-Taiba, pakistani millitant group blamed by opponent.

6 0
3 years ago
The Psychosocial conflict most likely to occur during midlife is the ____________________________ vs. __________________________
disa [49]
I go with Erikson. -
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • My older brother calls me names and beats me up! What should I do? ;(
    9·1 answer
  • Importance of River transportation
    12·2 answers
  • Proxemics is the study of how communication is the social relationship between two or more individuals.
    13·1 answer
  • 5. Where is Grand Canyon found? How is it formed​
    9·2 answers
  • With the sudden growth of cities, housing became scarce so some houses were divided into small apartments where entire families
    13·1 answer
  • How did Lake Superior help the lumber and iron industries? (chapter 11 flour lumber and iron)
    13·2 answers
  • Why were Native Americans forced to choose sides?
    5·1 answer
  • What is an example of how the government under apartheid limited people’s rights and an example of how rights expanded after the
    12·1 answer
  • What is not a branch in the Roman Republic?<br> a) judges b) consuls c) assembly d) tribunes
    8·1 answer
  • Should he call the television program? Yes, because at least he will receive some useful information. Yes, but the call should n
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!