All categories

3 years ago

What did bohr's model of the atom do that rutherford's model did not?

Chemistry

2 answers:

S_A_V [24]3 years ago

8 0

it focused on the location and energy of a electron

Lelu [443]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Bohr model proved that electrons orbit the nucleus in distinct energy levels.

Explanation:

Rutherford's atomic model proved that the nucleus of the atom is positively charged and the electrons are placed randomly outside the nucleus. But Bohr's atomic orbital explained the spectral lines of different elements by theorizing that the electrons orbit the nucleus in distinct orbits or energy levels. Upon accepting energy electrons jump from lower to higher energy levels and release energy when they return to a lower energy level from a higher energy level.

You might be interested in

The diagram above shows the repeating groups of atoms that make up two samples. Will the properties of the two samples likely be

Fed [463]

Completely off topic but I couldn’t help but notice you play valorant. If your down what’s ur name and tag line?

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following elements is a metalloid

vladimir1956 [14]

Traditionally they include boron from group 3A, silicon and germanium in group 4A, aresnic and antimony in group 5A and tellurium from group 6A, although sometimes selenium, astatine, polonium and even bismuth have also been considered as metalloids. Typically metalloids are brittle and show a semi-metallic luster.

The six commonly recognised metalloids are boron, silicon, germanium, arsenic, antimony, and tellurium. Five elements are less frequently so classified: carbon, aluminium, selenium, polonium, and astatine.

4 0

3 years ago

Answer seventeen please

kondor19780726 [428]

A. Ammonium = polyatomic ion
B. Oxygen = compound
C. Silver = element
D. Nitrate = polyatomic ion
E. Helium = element
F. Water = polyatomic ion
G. Nitrogen = element
H. Carbon dioxide = compound

3 0

3 years ago

he rate constant of a certain reaction is known to obey the Arrhenius equation, and to have an activation energy . If the rate c

Leya [2.2K]

The question is incomplete, here is the complete question:

The rate constant of a certain reaction is known to obey the Arrhenius equation, and to have an activation energy Ea = 71.0 kJ/mol . If the rate constant of this reaction is 6.7 M^(-1)*s^(-1) at 244.0 degrees Celsius, what will the rate constant be at 324.0 degrees Celsius?

<u>Answer:</u> The rate constant at 324°C is $61.29M^{-1}s^{-1}$

<u>Explanation:</u>

To calculate rate constant at two different temperatures of the reaction, we use Arrhenius equation, which is:

$\ln(\frac{K_{324^oC}}{K_{244^oC}})=\frac{E_a}{R}[\frac{1}{T_1}-\frac{1}{T_2}]$

where,

$K_{244^oC}$ = equilibrium constant at 244°C = $6.7M^{-1}s^{-1}$

$K_{324^oC}$ = equilibrium constant at 324°C = ?

$E_a$ = Activation energy = 71.0 kJ/mol = 71000 J/mol (Conversion factor: 1 kJ = 1000 J)

R = Gas constant = 8.314 J/mol K

$T_1$ = initial temperature = $244^oC=[273+244]K=517K$

$T_2$ = final temperature = $324^oC=[273+324]K=597K$

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$\ln(\frac{K_{324^oC}}{6.7})=\frac{71000J}{8.314J/mol.K}[\frac{1}{517}-\frac{1}{597}]\\\\K_{324^oC}=61.29M^{-1}s^{-1}$

Hence, the rate constant at 324°C is $61.29M^{-1}s^{-1}$

8 0

3 years ago

How are stars and comets different?

ehidna [41]

The answer is letter C.

Because we classify something as a star when it is: a large ball of gas that undergoes nuclear fusion. Given this definition, a comet is not a star. A comet is a ball of ice and dirt hurtling through space, it shines only because it reflects ligh

3 0

2 years ago