The capacity to read texts "by sight" is eventually supported by having this competence. This is the main reason that the ability to identify, segment, blend, and manipulate individual phonemes in spoken words is important for reading an alphabetic writing system. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is an alphabetic writing system?</h3>
Generally, It is common practice to make a distinction between alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic methods of writing (Gelb 1952). Therefore, alphabetic writing systems are instances of systems in which visual units correspond with phonemes. Some examples of alphabetic writing systems are the English, Italian, Russian, and Korean writing systems.
In conclusion, Eventually, possessing this competency will help one's ability to read written texts "by sight." Reading an alphabetic writing system requires one to have the capacity to recognize, separate, mix, and otherwise manipulate the different phonemes that make up spoken words. This is the primary reason for this need.
Read more about the alphabetic writing system
brainly.com/question/11905015
#SPJ1
Answer:
The immediate causes of the War of 1812 were a series of economic sanctions taken by the British and French against the US as part of the Napoleonic Wars and American outrage at the British practice of impressment, especially after the Chesapeake incident of 1807.
The answer is:
The U.S. Government has allowed emerging adults to remain on their parents health insurance until age 26.
Quick information:
Emerging adulthood is a period between 18 to 25. Most identity exploration takes place in emerging adulthood rather than adolescence. In the Western cultures, many young people are no longer adolescents but have not yet fully achieved full independence on adults.
Incas:
conquered by Francisco Pizarro
located in the Andes Mountains
worshiped the sun god, Inti
Aztecs:
conquered by Hernan Cortez
located in Central America
worshiped many gods, including Quetzalcoati
The answer is "it is called bio-ethics".
Bioethics is the investigation of ordinarily questionable morals achieved by progresses in science and solution. Bioethicists frequently differ among themselves over the exact furthest reaches of the discipline, debating whether the field should worry about the moral assessment of all inquiries including science and solution, or just a subset of these inquiries.
