The best way to explain the relationships in a nuclear reaction is by using:

asambeis [7]

In many ways, the Rutherford model of the atom is the classic model of the atom, even though it's no longer considered an accurate representation. Rutherford's model shows that an atom is mostly empty space, with electrons orbiting a fixed, positively charged nucleus in set, predictable paths.

This model of an atom was developed by Ernest Rutherford, a New Zealand native working at the University of Manchester in England in the early 1900s. Rutherford spent most of his academic career researching aspects of radioactivity and, in 1908, won the Nobel Prize for his discoveries related to radioactivity. It was after this that Rutherford began developing his model of the atom.

4 0

3 years ago

12. What is the mass, if the density is 2 and the volume is 6? *<br> 3<br> O 12<br> O 15

AURORKA [14]

The answer to this problem is =12

3 0

3 years ago

Which of these is correct?

Viktor [21]

Answer:

1.89 nol Cu(NO3)2

Explanation:

if you calculate it it will be 1.89

5 0

2 years ago

The reaction 2NO(g)+O2(g)−→−2NO2(g) is second order in NO and first order in O2. When [NO]=0.040M, and [O2]=0.035M, the observed

Oksanka [162]

Answer:

(a) The rate of disappearance of $O_{2}$ is: $4.65*10^{-5}$ M/s

(b) The value of rate constant is: 0.83036 $M^{-2}s^{-1}$

(c) The units of rate constant is: $M^{-2}s^{-1}$

(d) The rate will increase by a factor of 3.24

Explanation:

The rate of a reaction can be expressed in terms of the concentrations of the reactants and products in accordance with the balanced equation.

For the given reaction:

$2NO(g)+O_{2}->2NO_{2}$

rate = $-\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt}[NO]$ = $-\frac{d}{dt}[O_{2}]$ = $\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}[NO_{2}]$ -----(1)

According to the question, the reaction is second order in NO and first order in $O_{2}$ .

Then we can say that, rate = k $[NO]^{2}[O_{2}]$ -----(2)

where k is the rate constant.

The rate of disappearance of NO is given:

$-\frac{d}{dt}[NO]$ = $9.3*10^{-5}$ M/s.

(a) From (1), we can get the rate of disappearance of $O_{2}$ .

Rate of disappearance of $O_{2}$ = $-\frac{d}{dt}[O_{2}]$ = (0.5)*( $9.3*10^{-5}$ ) M/s = $4.65*10^{-5}$ M/s.

(b) The rate of the reaction can be obtained from (1).

rate = $-\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt}[NO]$ = (0.5)*( $9.3*10^{-5}$ )

rate = $4.65*10^{-5}$ M/s

The value of rate constant can be obtained by using (2).

rate constant = k = $\frac{rate}{[NO]^{2}[O_{2}]}$

k = $\frac{4.65*10^{-5}}{(0.040)^{2}(0.035)}$ = 0.83036 $M^{-2}s^{-1}$

(c) The units of the rate constant can be obtained from (2).

k = $\frac{rate}{[NO]^{2}[O_{2}]}$

Substituting the units of rate as M/s and concentrations as M, we get:

$\frac{Ms^{-1} }{M^{3}}$ = $M^{-2}s^{-1}$

(d) The reaction is second order in NO. Rate is proportional to square of the concentration of NO.

$rate\alpha [NO]^{2}$

If the concentration of NO increases by a factor of 1.8, the rate will increase by a factor of $(1.8)^{2}$ = 3.24

5 0

3 years ago

do you think that the continental plates continue to move across the surface of the earth? what evidence do you have to support

cestrela7 [59]

Yes I think & I Belive it moves across the surface

5 0

3 years ago