1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Neporo4naja [7]
3 years ago
6

How strongly the planet you're on Pulls on you

Physics
2 answers:
garik1379 [7]3 years ago
6 0
The mass is very heavy compared to the moon so the weight is pushing u down 18 lb
astra-53 [7]3 years ago
5 0

The two equal and opposite forces that attract you and the
planet you're on toward each other are caused by gravity. 

The force that pulls you toward the planet is what we call
your "weight". 

The force that pulls the planet toward you is equal to your
weight.  Nobody ever talks about that one.

You might be interested in
Summarize the Venn diagram.
Elena L [17]

Answer:

If this is a multiple choice question, then the answer is D.

Explanation:

Compounds are composed of atoms, which are composed of subatomic particles and consist of matter. Since they are composed of atoms rather than vice-versa, compounds cannot be found inside atoms and are not the most basic form of matter (ruling out A and C). A pure substance contains atoms, which are each composed of subatomic particles. Therefore, a pure substance must have atoms if it contains subatomic particles (ruling out B). The only answer left is D.

5 0
3 years ago
Scientists measure the time between the arrival of an earthquake's _______ and _______ waves to help determine the distance betw
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Scientists measure the time between the arrival of an earthquake's __P____ and ___S____ waves to help determine the distance between the recording seismograph and the earthquake epicenter.

Explanation:

P- (compressional) and S- (shear) waves produced in earthquakes travel at different speeds. P waves are faster than S waves and hence will be detected first by a seismograph after an earthquake. The further away a seismograph is from the epicenter of an earthquake,  the longer the time difference between the two (2) waves will be.

Using several, at least 3, seismographs located at different geoghraphical locations and detecting earthquakes, geologists can extrapolate the epicenter of an earthquake using the time differences in arrivals of the two waves in each of the seismographs, using the mathematics of triangulation.

Learn More:

For more on P- and S-- waves check out;

brainly.com/question/11915788

brainly.com/question/11334414

brainly.com/question/2530620

#LearnWithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
If you were told an atom was an ion, you would know the atom must have a ______?
andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer:

charge

Explanation:

7r0I and its etc. ,"!×_/;

3 0
3 years ago
A 44.0 kg uniform rod 4.90 m long is attached to a wall with a hinge at one end. The rod is held in a horizontal position by a w
pychu [463]

Answer:

x ≤ 3.6913 m

Explanation:

Given

Mrod = 44.0 kg

L = 4.90 m

Tmax = 1450 N

Mman = 69 kg

A: left end of the rod

B: right end of the rod

x = distance from the left end to the man

If we take torques around the left end as follows

∑τ = 0   ⇒   - Wrod*(L/2) - Wman*x + T*Sin 30º*L = 0

⇒   - (Mrod*g)*(L/2) - (Mman*g)*x + Tmax*Sin 30º*L = 0

⇒  -  (44*9.8)*(4.9/2) - (69*9.8)*x + (1450)*(0.5)*(4.9) = 0

⇒ x ≤ 3.6913 m

4 0
3 years ago
How does this relate to Newton's second law?
taurus [48]

Answer:

In ideal case, when no resistive forces are present then both the balls will reach the ground simultaneously. This is because acceleration due to gravity is independent of mass of the falling object. i.e. g = GM/R² where G = 6.67×10²³ Nm²/kg², M = mass of earth and R is radius of earth.

Let us assume that both are metallic balls. In such case, we have to take into account the magnetic field of earth (which will give rise to eddy currents, and these eddy currents will be more, if surface area will be more) and viscous drag of air ( viscous drag is proportional to radius of falling ball), then bigger ball will take slightly more time than the smaller ball.

Explanation:

In ideal case, when no resistive forces are present then both the balls will reach the ground simultaneously. This is because acceleration due to gravity is independent of mass of the falling object. i.e. g = GM/R² where G = 6.67×10²³ Nm²/kg², M = mass of earth and R is radius of earth.

Let us assume that both are metallic balls. In such case, we have to take into account the magnetic field of earth (which will give rise to eddy currents, and these eddy currents will be more, if surface area will be more) and viscous drag of air ( viscous drag is proportional to radius of falling ball), then bigger ball will take slightly more time than the smaller ball.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A car speeds up as it rolls down a hill. which is this an example of? positive acceleration negative acceleration relative veloc
    10·2 answers
  • Which element causes a star to go through a high mass cycle
    10·1 answer
  • If a glass rod is rubbed with a dry cloth, what kind of charge would it be:
    12·1 answer
  • While sitting on the couch, I am pushing down on it and it is pushing up on me. Which of Newton's laws of motion is this demonst
    14·2 answers
  • A 0.20 kg stone is dropped (from rest) from a height of 40.0 m above the ground. How far above the ground is the stone when it's
    15·1 answer
  • About 30 % of earth’s water found In
    6·1 answer
  • Define the types of friction and give FOUR examples of each
    7·1 answer
  • Louisa found that she could melt 150g of lead at 3275 C. At what temperature could she melt 75g of lead?
    5·1 answer
  • Answer this question i will mark you brainliest​
    15·1 answer
  • Need help asap please!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!