All categories

4 years ago

HELP PLEASE! :(

Chemistry

2 answers:

BabaBlast [244]4 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Part 1: W = 116 Y = 163

Part 2: Since 232 is the mailing point of 2 kg then you would divide 232 by 2 to get the melting point for 1 kg, the same with Y.

Fittoniya [83]4 years ago

6 0

W= 116 and Y= 163.5,

this is because if 2 kg of W= 232 and 2 kg of Y = 327, to find out the measure of 1 kg you would have to divide these two numbers by 2.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP THOSE WHO ARE CHEMISTS!! How many molecules are there in 79g of Fe2O3? How many atoms is this?

Shtirlitz [24]

1. Fe2O3 or Iron (III) oxide is an organic compound. It contains 3 main oxides of Iron, the iron (II) oxide (FeO) and the iron (II, III) oxide (Fe3O4).

Now, let’s find the number of Molecules are there in 79g of Fe203:
The number of Atoms are there:

Molar Mass of Fe2O3 = 160g / mol.
=> 160g of Fe2O3 = 6.02 x 1023 Molecules
=> 79g of Fe2O3 = x
Next, find the value of X, in where:
x = (6.02 x 1023 x 79g) / 160g is approximately
x = 2.97 x 1023 molecules.

8 0

3 years ago

Provide a balanced molecular equation, total ionic, and net ionic equation for sodium phosphate and zinc acetate.

vivado [14]

Answer: Balanced molecular equation :

$2Na_3PO_4(aq)+3(CH_3COO)_2Zn(aq)\rightarrow 6CH_3COONa(aq)+Zn_3(PO_4)_2(s)$

Total ionic equation:

$6Na^+(aq)+3PO_4^{2-}(aq)+6CH_3COO^-(aq)+3Zn^{2+}(aq)\rightarrow 6CH_3COO^-(aq)+6Na^+(aq)+Zn_3(PO_4)_2(s)$

The net ionic equation:

$2PO_4^{3-}(aq)+3Zn^{2+}(aq)\rightarrow Zn_3(PO_4)_2(s)$

Explanation:

Complete ionic equation : In complete ionic equation, all the substances that are strong electrolyte are present in an aqueous state as ions.

Net ionic equation : In the net ionic equations, we are not include the spectator ions in the equations.

Spectator ions : The ions present on reactant and product side which do not participate in a reactions. The same ions present on both the sides.

When sodium phosphate and zinc acetate then it gives zinc phosphate and sodium acetate as product.

The balanced molecular equation will be,

$2Na_3PO_4(aq)+3(CH_3COO)_2Zn(aq)\rightarrow 6CH_3COONa(aq)+Zn_3(PO_4)_2(s)$

The total ionic equation in separated aqueous solution will be,

$6Na^+(aq)+2PO_4^{3-}(aq)+6CH_3COO^-(aq)+3Zn^{2+}(aq)\rightarrow 6CH_3COO^-(aq)+6Na^+(aq)+Zn_3(PO_4)_2(s)$

In this equation, and are the spectator ions.

By removing the spectator ions from the balanced ionic equation, we get the net ionic equation.

The net ionic equation will be,

$2PO_4^{3-}(aq)+3Zn^{2+}(aq)\rightarrow Zn_3(PO_4)_2(s)$

5 0

3 years ago

Which three forces can affect an object without contact?

gavmur [86]

Answer:

gravity, magnetic, electrostatic

3 0

3 years ago

Calcium Carbonate reacts with dilute hydrochloric acid. The equation for the reaction is shown. CaCo3 + 2Hcl = Cacl2 + H2O + Co2

Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

Approximately $0.224\;\rm L$ , assuming that this reaction took place under standard temperature and pressure, and that $\rm CO_2$ behaves like an ideal gas. Also assume that the reaction went to completion.

Explanation:

The first step is to find out: which species is the limiting reactant?

Assume that $\rm CaCO_3$ is the limiting reactant. How many moles of $\rm CO_2$ would be produced?

Look up the relative atomic mass of $\rm Ca$ , $\rm C$ , and $\rm O$ on a modern periodic table:

$\rm Ca$ : $40.078$ .
$\rm C$ : $12.011$ .
$\rm O$ : $15.999$ .

Calculate the formula mass of $\rm CaCO_3$ :

$\begin{aligned} & M(\rm CaCO_3) \\ &= 40.078 + 12.011 + 3 \times 15.999 \\&= 100.086\; \rm g \cdot mol^{-1}\end{aligned}$ .

Calculate the number of moles of formula units in $1\; \rm g$ of $\rm CaCO_3$ using its formula mass:

$\begin{aligned}& n(\mathrm{CaCO_3})\\&= \frac{m(\mathrm{CaCO_3})}{M(\mathrm{CaCO_3})} \\ &= \frac{1\; \rm g}{100.086\; \rm g \cdot mol^{-1}} \approx 1.00\times 10^{-2}\; \rm mol\end{aligned}$ .

In the balanced chemical equation, the ratio between the coefficient of $\rm CaCO_3$ and that of $\rm CO_2$ is $\displaystyle \frac{n(\mathrm{CO_2})}{n(\mathrm{CaCO_3})} = 1$ .

In other words, for each mole of $\rm CaCO_3$ formula units consumed, one mole of $\rm CO_2$ would be produced.

If $\rm CaCO_3$ is indeed the limiting reactant, all that approximately $1.00\times 10^{-2}\; \rm mol$ of $\rm CaCO_3\!$ formula would be consumed. That would produce approximately $1.00\times 10^{-2}\; \rm mol\!$ of $\rm CO_2$ .

On the other hand, assume that $\rm HCl$ is the limiting reactant.

Convert the volume of $\rm HCl$ to $\rm dm^{3}$ (so as to match the unit of concentration.)

$\begin{aligned}&V(\mathrm{HCl})\\ &= 50\; \rm cm^{3} \\ &= 50\; \rm cm^{3} \times \frac{1\; \rm dm^{3}}{10^{3}\; \rm cm^{3}} \\ &= 5.00\times 10^{-2}\; \rm dm^{3} \end{aligned}$ .

Calculate the number of moles of $\rm HCl$ molecules in that $5.00\times 10^{-2}\; \rm dm^{3}$ of this $\rm 0.05\; \rm mol \cdot dm^{-3}$

$\begin{aligned}& n(\mathrm{HCl}) \\ &= c(\mathrm{HCl}) \cdot V(\mathrm{HCl}) \\ &= 0.05\; \rm mol \cdot dm^{-3}\\ &\quad\quad \times 5.00\times 10^{-2}\;\rm dm^{3} \\ &= 2.50 \times 10^{-3}\; \rm mol\end{aligned}$ .

Notice that in the balanced chemical reaction, the ratio between the coefficient of $\rm HCl$ and that of $\rm CO_2$ is $\displaystyle \frac{n(\mathrm{CO_2})}{n(\mathrm{HCl})} = \frac{1}{2}$ .

In other words, each mole of $\rm HCl$ molecules consumed would produce only $0.5\;\rm mol$ of $\rm CO_2$ molecules.

Therefore, if $\rm HCl$ is the limiting reactant, that $2.50 \times 10^{-3}\; \rm mol$ of $\rm HCl\!$ molecules would produce only one-half as many (that is, $1.25\times 10^{-3}\; \rm mol$ ) of $\rm CO_2$ molecules.

If $\rm CaCO_3$ is the limiting reactant, $\rm 1.00\times 10^{-3}\; \rm mol$ of $\rm CO_2$ molecules would be produced. However, if $\rm HCl$ is the limiting reactant, $1.25\times 10^{-3}\; \rm mol$ of $\rm CO_2\!$ molecules would be produced.

In reality, no more than $\rm 1.00\times 10^{-3}\; \rm mol$ of $\rm CO_2$ molecules would be produced. The reason is that all $\rm CaCO_3$ would have been consumed before $\rm HCl$ was.

After finding the limiting reactant, approximate the volume of the $\rm CO_2\!$ produced.

Assume that this reaction took place under standard temperature and pressure (STP.) Under STP, the volume of one mole of ideal gas molecules would be approximately $22.4\; \rm L$ .

If $\rm CO_2$ behaves like an ideal gas, the volume of that $\rm 1.00\times 10^{-3}\; \rm mol$ of $\rm CO_2\!$ molecules would be approximately $\rm 1.00\times 10^{-3}\; \rm mol \times 22.4\; \rm L = 0.224\; \rm L$ .

3 0

3 years ago

Which equation shows the beta decay of a transuranium element

GalinKa [24]

1) Since you have not provided the equations to select the right one, I am going to explain you the relevant facts that are used to solve this question.

2) The transuranium elements are the chemiical elements with atomic number greater than that of the uranium.

The atomic number of uranium is 92. So, the transuranium elements are the elements with atomic number 93 or greater.

This are some of the transuranium elements:

Neptunio - 93

Plutonium - 94

Americium - 95

Curium - 96

Berkelium - 97

Californium - 98

Einstenium - 99

And so all the known elements (the last one is the 118).

3) In a nuclear reaction the total mass number ( shown as superscript to the left of the symbol) and total atomic number (shown as subscript to the left of the symbol) are conserved.

4) Beta decay is the release of a beta particle, which is an electron (considered massles and with charge - 1). So, the beta decay is represented with the symbol:

β, which means 0 mass and charge - 1.

-1

5) This is, then, an example of a β decay equation for one transuranium element:

239 239 0

Np → Pu + β

93 94 -1

As you see 239 = 239 + 0 and 93 = 94 - 1, showing that the total mass number ( shown as superscript to the left of the symbol) and the total atomic number (shown as subscript to the left of the symbol) are conserved.

5 0

3 years ago