False.
No atoms are created or destroyed.
Answer:
stimulus generalization
Explanation:
<u>Stimulus generalization is the process that occurs when our conditioned reaction to one stimulus is similar to the reaction that revokes other, sometimes identical, stimulus.</u>
In this example, we see that Sheeba is reacting to the sound of the vacuum cleaner, and she started connecting the noise of the vacuum to the noise of the mixer. Therefore, <u>they are generalized stimuli, put in the same category in her consciousness, and awaking the same barking and attacking reaction.</u>
In the confidence interval method the sample data must come from a population that is normally distributed with no outliers.
A confidence interval is a range of values derived from observable data at a desired level of confidence that may include the parameter's true value. The confidence level, such as a 95% confidence level, refers to the accuracy of the estimating process rather than the degree of assurance that the computed confidence interval accurately represents the true value of the parameter under investigation. Confidence intervals are typically written as (some value) ± (a range). The range can be expressed as a percentage or as a real amount. The equation used to determine the confidence interval varies depending on which standard deviation is known.
Learn more about confidence interval calculation
brainly.com/question/14284377?
#SPJ4
Afterimages is known to be the illusion that best illustrates the opponent process.
<h3>What is the opponent process?</h3>
Note that The opponent-process theory is most useful for telling an attribute of Afterimages
This theory states that opposing retinal processes (red-green, yellow-blue, white-black) helps to bring about color vision.
Therefore, Afterimages is known to be the illusion that best illustrates the opponent process.
Learn more about opponent process from
brainly.com/question/26428681
#SPJ11
"I would give him a score of about 5 out of 10, which was a vast improvement over John Q. Adams and his cronies. If you were a poor, white male, he was your guy. He greatly democratized the process of elections in that era and was our first grassroots president. However, Jackson usually did what Jackson wanted to do, even if it meant alienating many of the people who got him elected. He did not side with Southerners during the nullification crisis and was prepared to use troops against South Carolina to enforce a law that most Southerners hated. He blatantly ignored John Marshall’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia, but an argument could be made here that he was acting in favor of democracy in this case, as most white Southerners probably wanted the Cherokee moved off of their land. He was a very complex and fascinating guy, but his critics called him King Andrew for a reason." -Robert Marshall
