Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.
Answer:
c. Modify existing legislation to allow exceptions
Explanation:
Congress is responsible for law making, the court interprets the law while the executive enforces the law. Congress can limit the impact of a court ruling by modifying existing laws regarding that issue and include exceptions.
Foe example, if the court rules that an individual must come to work on Saturday despite that day being the day for his/her religious meet as in the case of the Seventh-Day Adventist, the congress can review the laws on that issue and modify it to include exceptions.
Answer: Those who are better off economically are likely to have advantages of better living standards.
Explanation: With better living standards, upper economic classes have <u>more acess to education, health systems, better jobs</u>, etc. In this way, the <u>least advantaged classes</u>, that have difficult or<u> no acess at all to such services</u>, are at lose. Without education, the jobs are worse and worse. Being not able to have a well-paid job, a person can't afford health services, therefore resulting in higher death rates among them. That is the idea behind the "social inequality of death" theory.
Answer:
Are not always compatible
Explanation:
He had been exiled by both God and men. Grendel an evil presence that lives in the swamps and threatens Hero. Beowulf do to Grendel's body when he discovered it in his mom's den to remove its head and conveyed it to Hrothgar as a trophy.
