Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
C, i may be wrong but if not can i have brainliest... much appreciated
Explanation:
Hard money refers to coins, while soft money refers to paper currency. But the terms also have a role in politics. They are used to refer to political contributions in the United States.
Answer:
cry and force them into it
Supreme Court: Traditional religious belief not necessary for conscientious objector status. ... The Court ruled 6-3 that his beliefs were sufficiently religious such that he was entitled to CO status. Justice Hugo L. Black authored an opinion for four justices interpreting the Selective Service Act.
