Answer:
a case appealed from a lower court
Explanation:
sometimes quizlet gots the answers
Answer:
free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution
. ... The trial took place in 1960, in a segregated court room in Montgomery, before a white judge and all-white jury
Explanation:
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of American public officials to sue for defamation.
The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously on March 9, 1964, in The New York Times v. Sullivan that the Constitution prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood related to his official conduct. ... Sullivan, he was in favor of an entirely different approach to libel.
Answer:
Option 3 is the answer - Do not have to be approved by the senate
Explanation:
In executive agreement, two or more heads of nations come together to form these agreements that are politically binding. They are not like treaties formally drafted as an international agreement or pact between sovereign states and international organisations that would require the advice and approvals of two-thirds of the senate before it can be effective (as seen in the U.S ).
Federal, state, and local governments tax their citizens to collect blank for various programs and services. The federal government’s main income sources include blank taxes, while state and local governments rely heavily on blank taxes.
Answer:
a and b only
Explanation:
Errors can be made in law courts and they can either be harmless, or reversible. When the errors are said to be harmless, it means that when the jury rule in any way, the verdict would not be affected, but when the outcome would be different should the rulings be made in another way, then a reversible error can occur. Misapplication of the law by the judge and the refusal to allow material testimony can cause reversible errors.