All categories

3 years ago

Can 200 watts lift a 100 kg box,and if so how long would it take?

1 answer:

4 0

The only definite number we can tell you is that in order to lift
a 100kg box, you have to somehow provide a force of about
980 newtons (about 220 pounds) pointing upward. That's the
weight of the box, and you have to lift with at least that much force
just to get the box off the ground.

After that, the answer to your question is 'YES'. The time it takes
depends on how much force you have available, how far you want
to lift the box, and how fast.

Here are the Physics formulas you have to use:

-- The amount of "Work" you'll do is

(the amount of force you use) times (how far up you lift the box) .

-- The "Power" (amount of watts) you'll use is

(the amount of 'work' you do) divided by (the length of time it takes).

So ...

-- The higher you lift the box, the more 'work' your lift-machine does.

-- The faster the box is lifted, the more 'power' your lift-machine needs.

You might be interested in

Why do objects move at constant speed

kati45 [8]

Most objects move at a constant speed because of friction and acceleration. The constant speed keeps them in place, and keeps a balance.

7 0

3 years ago

Jess rides her motorcycle at an average speed of 20 m/s for 500 seconds. how far did she ride

Sedaia [141]

Distance = (speed) x (time)

Distance = (20 m/s) x (500 s)

Distance = (20 x 500) (m·s / s)

Distance = 10,000 m

5 0

3 years ago

Which is an example of a trace fossil?

hodyreva [135]

Answer: The correct answer is A). Animal burrow because burrow fossils represent the preserved byproducts of behavior rather than physical remains, they are considered a kind of trace fossil. One common kind of burrow fossil is known as Skolithos, and the similar Trypanites, Ophiomorpha and Diplocraterion.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare the wavelengths of an electron (mass = 9.11 × 10−31 kg) and a proton (mass = 1.67 × 10−27 kg), each having (a) a speed o

Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

Part A:

The proton has a smaller wavelength than the electron.

$\lambda_{proton} = 6.05x10^{-14}m$ < $\lambda_{electron} = 1.10x10^{-10}m$

Part B:

The proton has a smaller wavelength than the electron.

$\lambda_{proton} = 1.29x10^{-13}m$ < $\lambda_{electron} = 5.525x10^{-12}m$

Explanation:

The wavelength of each particle can be determined by means of the De Broglie equation.

$\lambda = \frac{h}{p}$ (1)

Where h is the Planck's constant and p is the momentum.

$\lambda = \frac{h}{mv}$ (2)

Part A

Case for the electron:

$\lambda = \frac{6.624x10^{-34} J.s}{(9.11x10^{-31}Kg)(6.55x10^{6}m/s)}$

But $J = Kg.m^{2}/s^{2}$

$\lambda = \frac{6.624x10^{-34}Kg.m^{2}/s^{2}.s}{(9.11x10^{-31}Kg)(6.55x10^{6}m/s)}$

$\lambda = 1.10x10^{-10}m$

Case for the proton:

$\lambda = \frac{6.624x10^{-34}Kg.m^{2}/s^{2}.s}{(1.67x10^{-27}Kg)(6.55x10^{6}m/s)}$

$\lambda = 6.05x10^{-14}m$

Hence, the proton has a smaller wavelength than the electron.

<em>Part B </em>

For part b, the wavelength of the electron and proton for that energy will be determined.

First, it is necessary to find the velocity associated to that kinetic energy:

$KE = \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}$

$2KE = mv^{2}$

$v^{2} = \frac{2KE}{m}$

$v = \sqrt{\frac{2KE}{m}}$ (3)

Case for the electron:

$v = \sqrt{\frac{2(7.89x10^{-15}J)}{9.11x10^{-31}Kg}}$

but $1J = kg \cdot m^{2}/s^{2}$

$v = \sqrt{\frac{2(7.89x10^{-15}kg \cdot m^{2}/s^{2})}{9.11x10^{-31}Kg}}$

$v = 1.316x10^{8}m/s$

Then, equation 2 can be used:

$\lambda = \frac{6.624x10^{-34}Kg.m^{2}/s^{2}.s}{(9.11x10^{-31}Kg)(1.316x10^{8}m/s)}$

$\lambda = 5.525x10^{-12}m$

Case for the proton :

$v = \sqrt{\frac{2(7.89x10^{-15}J)}{1.67x10^{-27}Kg}}$

But $1J = kg \cdot m^{2}/s^{2}$

$v = \sqrt{\frac{2(7.89x10^{-15}kg \cdot m^{2}/s^{2})}{1.67x10^{-27}Kg}}$

$v = 3.07x10^{6}m/s$

Then, equation 2 can be used:

$\lambda = \frac{6.624x10^{-34}Kg.m^{2}/s^{2}.s}{(1.67x10^{-27}Kg)(3.07x10^{6}m/s)}$

$\lambda = 1.29x10^{-13}m$

Hence, the proton has a smaller wavelength than the electron.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following correctly arranges the planets by the size of their diameter in increasing order?

valentinak56 [21]

Increasing Order..
So, it's from the little one into the biggest one..

My Answer is
C: Mercury < Earth < Saturn < Jupiter

What Shape of The Earth ?
Is it Round or Flat ?
Subjective Answer..

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers