Here is your answer:
Remember that potential energy is the energy a object has when it's NOT moving, and kinetic energy is when a object has energy when it IS moving. So examples of this kid of transformation would be kicking a soccer ball at first the soccer ball has potential energy because it's not moving but it has potential to move then when someone kicks the soccer ball it has kinetic energy because the ball is not moving.
Example one: when the video first begin "the ball had potential energy and when the ball swung and hit it that potential energy turned into kinetic energy."
Example two: As the video moves on and the two pillars crashed down it caused another ball to move, at first the "ball had potential energy because it was not moving then when the ramp went down it caused the ball to gain kinetic energy."
Example three: At the end of the video the ball push down a row of wooden blocks then lead to it hitting a "bowling ball across the finish line even though the ball moved slowly and not far it still came from potential energy into kinetic energy."
Hope this helps!
Oxygen is more electronegative than boron. It has more tendency to attract a electron pair while boron is electropositive that means it has more tendency to lose an electron so when there will be a bond between boron and oxygen than boron carries the partial positive charge while oxygen carries the partial negative charge.
The colour of copper sulphate solution is blue
Answer:
(a) No. Ground-state carbon has only 2 half-filled orbitals that could be used for bonding.
(b) No. The bond angles would be incorrect as the p-orbitals are all perpendicular to each other (90°).
Explanation:
See attachment for the ground-state and excited-state electron orbital diagrams of carbon.
A methane molecule has all four CH bonds the same length and at 109.5° from each other. Hybridization of the s and p orbitals to sp³ orbitals is necessary.