Which equation is not equivalent to the formula m = ca?

1 answer:

3 0

$\displaystyle\\ m = c \times a\\\\ \Longrightarrow \begin{cases} c = \dfrac{m}{a} \\\\ a = \dfrac{m}{c} \\\\ m = a\times c \end{cases}\\\\ \Longrightarrow\text{Equation}\text{\bf "a equals c over m"}\text { is NOT equivalent to the formula m = ca}$

You might be interested in

I put a picture<br><br> —PLEASE HELP

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

$▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪ {\huge\mathfrak{Answer}}▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪▪$

Base of a cube is a square, and in the given figure it's stated that the measure of each side is " x " ft

Therefore it's Area is equal to : -

$side \times side$

$x \times x$

${x}^{2}$

Now, since it's Area is given as 1/4 ft², let's equate the Areas to find the measure of each side ~

that is ~

${x}^{2} = \dfrac{1}{4}$

$x = \sqrt{ \dfrac{1}{2} \times \dfrac{1}{2} }$

$x = \dfrac{1}{2} \: \: feet$

It's time to find the volume of cube that is ~

$(side) {}^{3}$

So, let's plug the value of side length (1/2 ft)

Volume is equal to ~

${ \bigg(\dfrac{1}{2} \bigg) }^{3}$

$\dfrac{1}{8} \: \: ft {}^{3}$

Hence, the required 1/8 or 0.125 ft³

I hope it helped ~

$\mathrm{✌TeeNForeveR✌}$

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement best describes why the sale price is a function of the original price?

stich3 [128]

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

A relation is a <em>function</em> when there is exactly one output for each input. That is the case in this table, so the relation between the original price and sale price is a function.