Is carbon dioxide a good absorber of infrared radiation

QveST [7]

Johnny should have thrown away the unused chemicals because they still could have mixed with the other chemicals and it could cause a reaction.

5 0

3 years ago

Unlike an animal's habitat, an animal's niche can be described by all of the following except A. the job the organism has within

Artemon [7]

A niche is the role an organism fills within its environment. What and where an animal eats are considered part of its niche. For instance, some birds, such as woodpeckers, eat insects in trees. This limits the bug population and keeps bugs from overtaking the environment.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS IN UR OWN WORDS!!!!!

alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

1. They debated about many things.

2. Greek philosophers debated about things. They did not have a scientific/experiment based approach to studying nature. They did not have tools.

3. Democritus

4. Democritus had the basic idea of atoms, even though he had no experimental evidence to support his thinking.

5. taught that there were substances called atoms and that these atoms made up all material things. The atoms were unchangeable, indestructible, and always existed.

Explanation:

hope this helps

8 0

3 years ago

The reaction: 2 CO(l) + O2(g) ⇄2 CO2(g) with a H = −25.0 kJ/mol, is at equilibrium. Which of the following lists three ways thi

elena-s [515]

Answer:

Option B and D both have 3 ways to shift the reaction to the right

Explanation:

The reaction 2 CO(l) + O2(g) ⇄2 CO2(g) is exothermic because ΔH = -25 kJ < 0 This means heat will be released

Therefore, increasing the temperature will shift the equilibrium to the left, while decreasing the temperature will shift the equilibrium to the right.

A. remove CO2, lower pressure and remove CO

⇒ Lowering the pressure will shift the equilibrium to the side with most moles of gas : On the left side there are 3 moles, on the right side 2 moles. By lowering the pressure, the equilibrium will shift to the left.

B remove CO2, raise pressure and add CO

⇒ By raising the pressure, the equilibrium will shift to the side with the lesser amount of moles of gas. This is the right side.

⇒ Remove CO2: the equilibrium will shift to the side of CO2 ,so the reaction will shift toward products to replace the product removed. (The right side).

⇒ Add CO: the equilibrium will shift to the side of CO2, so the reaction will shift toward the products side to reduce the added CO. (The right side).

C raise temperature, lower pressure and remove O2

⇒ Increasing the temperature will shift the equilibrium to the left

D add O2, raise pressure and lower temperature

⇒ decreasing the temperature will shift the equilibrium to the right

⇒ By raising the pressure, the equilibrium will shift to the side with the lesser amount of moles of gas. This is the right side.

⇒ Add O2: the equilibrium will shift to the side of CO2, so the reaction will shift toward the products side to reduce the added O2. (The right side).

E remove CO2, increase volume and lower temperature

⇒ decreasing the temperature will shift the equilibrium to the right

⇒ Remove CO2: the equilibrium will shift to the side of CO2 ,so the reaction will shift toward products to replace the product removed. (The right side).

⇒ Increase volume : with a pressure decrease due to an increase in volume, the side with more moles is more favorable. The equilibrium will shift to the left side.

8 0

3 years ago

It is usually assumed that an action potential begins immediately at the cathode. If this were true, both methods for calculatin

jarptica [38.1K]

Answer: Provided in the explanation section

Explanation:

Our questions says that:

It is usually assumed that an action potential begins immediately at the cathode. If this were true, both methods for calculating conduction velocity would provide the same answer. However, when a strong stimulus intensity is used, the action potential may begin some distance away from the cathode. Under these conditions, the difference method would be more accurate.Did you observe any important difference between the conduction velocity values?

Answer to this :

By using the difference method, you subtract out any "uncertainties" involved in the measurement of latencies. Say for example, saw we are uncertain as to where the AP's are actually originating within the vicinity of the stimulating electrodes, this "error" will be introduced into both latency measurements, and therefore subtracted out when performing a difference method calculation.

However, the difference method is only experimentally sound when one is dealing with the same population of nerve fibres over the recording electrodes used, which is not the case with the sciatic nerve, as it is a short nerve, and thin at one end.

The non-uniformity of the nerve, and the difficulty in making accurate measurements of very small distances and latencies are principal points to consider when making conduction velocity measurements. Naturally if the nerve studied were longer and more uniform, we would improve the accuracy of our calculations.

cheers i hope this helped !!!!

7 0

3 years ago