Answer:
0.189 g.
Explanation:
- This problem is an application on <em>Henry's law.</em>
- Henry's law states that the solubility of a gas in a liquid is directly proportional to its partial pressure of the gas above the liquid.
- Solubility of the gas ∝ partial pressure
- If we have different solubility at different pressures, we can express Henry's law as:
<em>S₁/P₁ = S₂/P₂,</em>
S₁ = 0.0106/0.792 = 0.0134 g/L and P₁ = 0.321 atm
S₂ = ??? g/L and P₂ = 5.73 atm
- So, The solubility of the gas at 5.73 atm (S₂) = S₁.P₂/P₁ = (0.0134 g/L x 5.73 atm) / (0.321 atm) = 0.239 g/L.
<em>The quantity in (g) = S₂ x V = (0.239 g/L)(0.792 L) = 0.189 g.</em>
<em></em>
9 g of hydrogen - 42 g of nitrogen
5 g of hydrogen - x g of nitrogen

The mass of nitrogen in the second sample is 23.33 g.
Answer : The number of moles in 369 grams of calcium hydroxide is, 4.98 moles
Explanation : Given,
Mass of calcium hydroxide = 369 g
Molar mass of calcium hydroxide = 74.093 g/mole
Formula used :

Now put all the given values in this formula, we get the moles of calcium hydroxide.

Therefore, the number of moles in 369 grams of calcium hydroxide is, 4.98 moles
Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
The statement that best explains why magnesium and chlorine combine in a 1:2 ratio is; Magnesium has two valence electrons, and chlorine can accept one electron in its outer shell.
The number of electrons that an atom of an element has in its outermost shell determines the chemical formula of the compounds formed by atoms such elements.
Magnesium is in group 2, as such it has two electrons in its outermost shell while chlorine in group 17 only accepts one electron in its outermost shell. This one electron will give chlorine an inert gas configuration while the loss of two electrons give magnesium an inert gas configuration.
Therefore; The compound MgCl2 is formed in the ratio of 1:2 because Magnesium has two valence electrons, and chlorine can accept one electron in its outer shell.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/11527546