All categories

3 years ago

What is nacl monosaccharide disaccharide organic or inorganic?

1 answer:

8 0

<span>inorganic Let's look at the choices and see why they work, or don't work. monosaccharide * Otherwise known as a simple sugar. And NaCl is definitely not a sugar of any type. So this is wrong. disaccharide * Complex sugar. And NaCl doesn't qualify either. organic * A definition of an organic compound is one that has carbon in it. NaCl has sodium and chlorine. No carbon at all, so this isn't the right answer. And I wish that organic was an earlier choice, since the sugars mentioned above are organic compounds. inorganic * This is the only possible choice. Salt is not an organic compound since it doesn't have carbon. So it can't be a sugar either. But it can and is inorganic.</span>

You might be interested in

How do heater meals work?

drek231 [11]

Answer:

The patented TRUE-TECH Self-Heating Technology is a simple combination of food grade iron and magnesium powder, salt, and water. When the contents of the water pouch are poured over the heater pad, the Food Heater releases enough heat to warm-up a pre-cooked meal 100 degrees Fahrenheit in approximately 10 minutes.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

A baseline for an experimental investigation is provided by the

Rina8888 [55]

A baseline for experimental investigation is provided by an hypothesis. This is a must before conducting experiments. Also, it is the hypothesis that is being proved by doing the experiments. So, hypothesis is very important in research studies. Hope this answers the question.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

According to the equation below, how many moles of PbO are required to generate 3.88×1023 nitrogen molecules?

saul85 [17]

Answer:

1.935 mole

Explanation:

We'll begin by calculating the number of mole present in 3.88x10^23 molecules of nitrogen(N2). This can be obtained as follow:

From Avogadro's hypothesis, 1 mole of any substance contains 6.02x10^23 molecules. Therefore 1 mole of N2 contains 6.02x10^23 molecules.

Now if 1 mole of N2 contains 6.02x10^23 molecules,

Then Xmol of N2 will contain 3.88x10^23 molecules i.e

Xmol of N2 = (3.88x10^23)/6.02x10^23

Xmol of N2 = 0.645 mole

Now, we can obtain the number of moles of PbO required to generate 3.88x10^23 molecules (i.e 0.645 mole) of N2. This is illustrated below:

The equation for the reaction is given below:

3PbO + 2NH3 → 3Pb + N2 + 3H2O

From the balanced equation above, 3 moles of PbO produced 1 mole of N2.

Therefore, Xmol of PbO will produce 0.645 mole of N2 i.e

Xmol of PbO = 3 x 0.645

Xmol of PbO = 1.935 mole.

From the calculations made above,

1.935 mole of PbO will produce 3.88x10^23 molecules of nitrogen (N2).

8 0

3 years ago

The reaction of NO2 with ozone produces NO3 in a second-order reaction overall.

Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer : The rate of reaction is,

$Rate=4.77\times 10^{-19}M/s$

The appearance of $NO_3$ is, $4.77\times 10^{-19}M/s$

Explanation :

The general rate of reaction is,

$aA+bB\rightarrow cC+dD$

Rate of reaction : It is defined as the change in the concentration of any one of the reactants or products per unit time.

The expression for rate of reaction will be :

$\text{Rate of disappearance of A}=-\frac{1}{a}\frac{d[A]}{dt}$

$\text{Rate of disappearance of B}=-\frac{1}{b}\frac{d[B]}{dt}$

$\text{Rate of formation of C}=+\frac{1}{c}\frac{d[C]}{dt}$

$\text{Rate of formation of D}=+\frac{1}{d}\frac{d[D]}{dt}$

$Rate=-\frac{1}{a}\frac{d[A]}{dt}=-\frac{1}{b}\frac{d[B]}{dt}=+\frac{1}{c}\frac{d[C]}{dt}=+\frac{1}{d}\frac{d[D]}{dt}$

From this we conclude that,

In the rate of reaction, A and B are the reactants and C and D are the products.

a, b, c and d are the stoichiometric coefficient of A, B, C and D respectively.

The negative sign along with the reactant terms is used simply to show that the concentration of the reactant is decreasing and positive sign along with the product terms is used simply to show that the concentration of the product is increasing.

The given rate of reaction is,

$NO_2(g)+O_3(g)\rightarrow NO_3(g)+O_2(g)$