Answer:
The sample required is 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The standard deviation is 
The margin of error is 
Given that the confidence level is 99% then the level of significance is mathematically evaluated as
Next we will obtain the critical value 
from the normal distribution table(reference math dot armstrong dot edu) , the value is
The sample size is mathematically represented as
![n = [ \frac{Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } * \sigma }{E} ]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n%20%3D%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7BZ_%7B%5Cfrac%7B%5Calpha%20%7D%7B2%7D%20%7D%20%2A%20%20%5Csigma%20%7D%7BE%7D%20%5D%5E2)
substituting values
![n = [ \frac{ 2.58 * 9 }{2} ]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n%20%3D%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B%202.58%20%2A%20%209%20%7D%7B2%7D%20%5D%5E2)
THERE IS A 41% CHANCE HIS NEXT READING MATERIAL WILL BE A MAGAZINE
The function, g(x), has a constant rate of change and will increase at a faster rate than the function f(x) for all the values of x.
Given:
g(x) = 5/2 x -3 ..... (1)
f(x) = - 3.5 at x = 0
So, putting the value of x=0 in equation (1) for comparison. We get,
g(x) at x = 0
=> g(x) = 5/2 x (0) - 3
=> g(x) = -3
In this value of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x) having a value equal to -3.5.
Similarly, put x = 1 in equation (1) for comparison. We get,
=> g(x) = 5/2 x (1) - 3
=> g(x) = (5-6)/2
=> g(x) = -1/2
In this value of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x) having a value equal to -1.
Similarly, put x = 2 in equation (1) for comparison. We get,
=> g(x) = 5/2 x (2) - 3
=> g(x) = (5-3)
=> g(x) = 2
In this value of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x) having a value equal to 1.5.
Similarly, put x = 3 in equation (1) for comparison. We get,
=> g(x) = 5/2 x (3) - 3
=> g(x) = (15/2 - 3)
=> g(x) = 7.5 - 3
=> g(x) = 4.5
In this value of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x) having a value equal to 4.
Therefore, for all values of x function g(x) is faster than function f(x).
function f(x).
To learn more about the function visit: brainly.com/question/14996787
#SPJ1
Answer: 3/4 I’m pretty sure. I looked at it and got confused so not 100% sure.
Resposta: f ^ (- 1) (x) = (1/2) x-1/2
