Answer: a) Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the reasoning technique that works from particular instance to generating generalized conclusion.This reasoning have ability to conclude as false even if all premises of statement is correct or true alone with evidence.
According to the question, Sage is using inductive reasoning for forming true statement along with the evidences (example of Ford cars) still logical result is not correct.
Other options are incorrect because deductive reasoning, casual reasoning or either-or reasoning is not used by Sage.Thus, the correct option is option(a).
D. will be more likely to live in manhatten but work in the borough of brooklyn.
Preemption, is the answer you are looking for i believe.
Answer: B)only if transactions costs preclude bargaining between polluter and victim.
Explanation: Negative externalities is defined as the cost situation that arises due to the economic transaction. In this situation usually the third party(organization, owner of the property , any person) gets effected indirectly.
The government takes any step or interferes in this situation if the transaction cost is effecting the victim.The case can also lead to no settlement or bargaining between the the polluter(e.g.-company) and the victim(e.g.- public),thus.government takes action to resolve the matter.
Other options are incorrect because government interruption is required many disputes related with victim and environment. Government can invoke bargaining or settlement but cannot make it successful , it can be carried out by victim and polluter only. If the transact cost is high and unreasonable for the victim ,then usually government takes action.Thus, the correct option is option(B) .
