Explanation:
The shorter wavelength electromagnetic waves from sun are absorbed by earth material in form of short wavelength and the radiated wavelength are longer ones. Also higher energy waves are of shorter wavelength and lower energy waves have longer wavelength. So, they are absorbed as short wavelength and radiated back as long wavelength.
Answer: Carbon 14 and Uranium 238 are not used together to determine fossil ages.
Explanation:
Carbon 14 with a half life of 5,700 years can only be used to date fossils of approximately 50,000 years. Most fossils are thought to be much older than 50,000 years. Also most fossils no longer contain any Carbon. The fossilized remains have been mineralized where the original organic material has been replaced and turned into stones containing no carbon.
Uranium 238 has a half life of 4.5 billion years. Uranium can be used to date the age of the earth. If 50% of pure uranium' is left in a sample the sample is assumed to be 4.5 billion years old.( This is assuming that the original sample was 100% uranium and no Uranium 238 has been eroded or lost in 4.5 billion years old. If a fossil has only 25 % of the Uranium 238 the sample has an estimated age of 3.2 Billion years. This would be the estimated age of the earliest life or formation of fossils.
Note no fossils contain Uranium 238. Uranium 238 is only found in igneous or volcanic rocks. So no fossils can be dated directly using U 238.
Because of the huge differences in the half lives of Carbon 14 and Uranium238 they cannot be used together. Carbon 14 can only be used to date fossils of a very recent age. Uranium 238 can only be used to date volcanic rocks of a very old age.
da answer is liquiddddddddd
Answer:1.084
Explanation:
Given
mass of Pendulum M=10 kg
mass of bullet m=5.5 gm
velocity of bullet u
After collision let say velocity is v
conserving momentum we get
Conserving Energy for Pendulum
Kinetic Energy=Potential Energy
here 
from diagram
therefore
initial velocity in terms of v
For first case 
for second case 
Therefore 
i.e.
Answer:
8.27°
Explanation:
To angle difference will be determined by the difference in the displacement of the springs, produced by the weight of the center of mass of the rod.
![d=y_1-y_2=\frac{F_1}{k_1}-\frac{F_2}{k_2}=\frac{0.5mg}{31N/m}-\frac{0.5mg}{63N/m}\\\\d=0.5(1.6kg)(9.8m/s^2)[\frac{1}{31N/m}-\frac{1}{63N/m}]=0.128m](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=d%3Dy_1-y_2%3D%5Cfrac%7BF_1%7D%7Bk_1%7D-%5Cfrac%7BF_2%7D%7Bk_2%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B0.5mg%7D%7B31N%2Fm%7D-%5Cfrac%7B0.5mg%7D%7B63N%2Fm%7D%5C%5C%5C%5Cd%3D0.5%281.6kg%29%289.8m%2Fs%5E2%29%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B31N%2Fm%7D-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B63N%2Fm%7D%5D%3D0.128m)
by a simple trigonometric relation you obtain that the angle:
hence, the angle between the rod and the horizontal is 8.27°
