I think B is the most correct, because logically it's harder to bend a stiffer spring than it is to bend a softer one. Also, I don't think length comes into play. So B.
Answer:
C = 1.01
Explanation:
Given that,
Mass, m = 75 kg
The terminal velocity of the mass, 
Area of cross section, 
We need to find the drag coefficient. At terminal velocity, the weight is balanced by the drag on the object. So,
R = W
or
Where
is the density of air = 1.225 kg/m³
C is drag coefficient
So,
So, the drag coefficient is 1.01.
Answer:
The x-component of 
is 56.148 newtons.
Explanation:
From 1st and 2nd Newton's Law we know that a system is at rest when net acceleration is zero. Then, the vectorial sum of the three forces must be equal to zero. That is:
(1)
Where:
, 
, 
- External forces exerted on the ring, measured in newtons.
- Vector zero, measured in newtons.
If we know that ![\vec F_{1} = (70.711,70.711)\,[N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cvec%20F_%7B1%7D%20%3D%20%2870.711%2C70.711%29%5C%2C%5BN%5D)
, ![\vec F_{2} = (-126.859, 46.173)\,[N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cvec%20F_%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%28-126.859%2C%2046.173%29%5C%2C%5BN%5D)
, 
and ![\vec O = (0,0)\,[N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cvec%20O%20%3D%20%280%2C0%29%5C%2C%5BN%5D)
, then we construct the following system of linear equations:
(2)
(3)
The solution of this system is:
, 
The x-component of is 56.148 newtons.
The physical model of the sun's interior has been confirmed by observations of neutrino and seismic vibrations.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Sun's interior is composed of very high temperature and solar flares. So it is very difficult to understand the interior of the sun. But by using the vibrations of neutrino and seismic waves emitted by the solar waves, the physical model can be assumed.
As the interior of the sun performs continuous chain of hydrogen cycle. So the continuous emission of energy from the chain reaction releases neutrino. So these vibrations in neutrino and seismic vibrations, the physical model can be assumed easily.
