3 years ago

Nate says that repeating decimals are rational numbers. Is Nate correct? Explain.

2 answers:

katrin2010 [14]3 years ago

8 0

Yes, Nate is correct about repeating decimals being considered rational numbers because they can be represented as a ratio of two integers.

DaniilM [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Nate is correct because any number that has a part (such as a decimal) is considered a rational number.

You might be interested in

JUST THE ANSWERS PLEASE

notsponge [240]

Answer:

Eli=180 Freda=260 and Geoff=360

8 0

3 years ago

What is the range of the following function?

Olin [163]

The range is the set of Y values. In this function it would be(-5,+5)

4 0

3 years ago

A gardening store ordered 1,290 potted plants last year. This year, the store ordered 70% more than that number. How many potted

Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

2,193 plants

Step-by-step explanation:

70% = 70/100 = 0.70

(0.70)(1290) = 903

903 + 1290 = 2193

3 0

3 years ago

50 points but please give a helpful answer <3

Rasek [7]

They are all (SAS)side angle side except for the bottom right one. This is because the question does not give the little ticks to show that one side is the same as the other. It is not good enough to assume they are congruent without proof.

8 0

4 years ago

ryan spend 2 3/4 hours doing his homework last night. He spend 2/3 of that time on his science homework. How long did ryan spend

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

It would be 2 1/12 of the time.

8 0

3 years ago