Answer:
- correct answer is C
- Haley incorrectly applied the distributive property
Step-by-step explanation:
If you simplify the given equation, you find it matches choice C.

__
Haley's error seems to be failing to distribute the 1/2 properly when she eliminated parentheses. Apparent, she incorrectly decided that ...
1/2(6 -x) ⇒ 3 -x . . . . instead of 3 -1/2x
Then when -x was added to +3x, she got 2x. Had she done it properly, she would have added -1/2x to +3x to get 5/2x.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
It is a common error to "distribute" the factor outside parentheses to the first term only, as Haley apparently did. Another common error is to fail to distribute minus signs properly. The distributive property requires you apply the outside factor to <em>all</em> of the terms inside parentheses.
Sometimes it will, and sometimes it won't.
I reason as follows:
(21 + x) + (30 + 2x) = 51 + 3x has an 'x' term
(42 + x) + (30 - x) = 72 has no 'x' term.
<span>√(5*8*24) or anything along those lines, you can switch the numbers around , it wont matter</span>
Answer: So what is two plus two plus two?
Well let me demonstrate. Take 2 cookies for example, your friend supplements 2 more cookies and there you have it 4 cookies. So two and two cookies are 4 cookies. Thus, 2+2=4
Step-by-step explanation: Hope I helped you out <3
-Carrie
60 because all of the sides are equal