According to Archimede's principle, a physical object experiences an upthrust due to a difference in pressure between upper and lower surfaces.
<h3>What is an
upthrust?</h3>
An upthrust is also referred to as buoyancy and it can be defined as an upward force which is exerted by a fluid (liquid or gas), so as to oppose the weight of a partially or fully immersed physical object that is floating in it.
Based on scientific information, a physical object experiences an upthrust when it is immersed in a fluid due to a difference in height and pressure between upper (top) and lower (bottom) surfaces.
According to Archimede's principle, there is a higher pressure at the bottom of the physical object due to height, and a lower pressure at the top of the physical object.
Read more on upthrust here: brainly.com/question/24389514
#SPJ1
Yo sup??
magnitude of original vector is 5 units.
angle made with x axis is 67°
horizontal component=5*cos67°
=5*0.4
=2 units (approx)
Therefore the correct answer is option B
Hope this helps
Answer:
Efficiency = 80%
Explanation:
Given the following data;
Work output = 240 N
Work Input = 300 N
To find the mechanical efficiency of a machine;
Substituting into the equation, we have;
Efficiency = 80%
Therefore, the mechanical efficiency of the machine is 80 percent.
Answer:
Explanation:
The net force on the potatoes is given by:
F= 52 - mgSintheta
F= 52- (2×9.8× Sin70°)
F = 52 -18.4
F= 33.58N
Using Newton's 2nd law
F = ma
a=F/m = 33.58/ 2 = 16.79m/s^2
Using the equation of motion:
V^2= u^2 + 2as
V^2 = 0 + 2× 16.79 x2
V^2 = 67.16
V=sqrt(68.16)
V= 8.195m/s This is the exit velocity of the potatoes
Kinetic energy, K.E = 1/2mv^2
KE= 1/2 × 2 × 8.195^2
KE = 67.16J
First choice: the inability of current technology to capture
large amounts of the
Sun's energy
Well, it's true that large amounts of it get away ... our 'efficiency' at capturing it is still rather low. But the amount of free energy we're able to capture is still huge and significant, so this isn't really a major problem.
Second choice: the inability of current technology to store
captured solar
energy
No. We're pretty good at building batteries to store small amounts, or raising water to store large amounts. Storage could be better and cheaper than it is, but we can store huge amounts of captured solar energy right now, so this isn't a major problem either.
Third choice: inconsistencies in the availability of the resource
I think this is it. If we come to depend on solar energy, then we're
expectedly out of luck at night, and we may unexpectedly be out
of luck during long periods of overcast skies.
Fourth choice: lack of
demand for solar energy
If there is a lack of demand, it's purely a result of willful manipulation
of the market by those whose interests are hurt by solar energy.
